DTLGX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio (DTLGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
DTLGX is managed by Wilshire Mutual Funds. It was launched on Sep 30, 1992. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
DTLGX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DTLGX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTLGX Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio | -10.04% | 21.95% | 35.90% | 39.81% | -31.60% | 22.61% | 38.78% | 28.64% | -2.20% | -0.83% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -9.81% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DTLGX having a -10.04% return and SWLGX slightly higher at -9.81%.
DTLGX
- 1D
- 4.17%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -10.04%
- 6M
- -10.13%
- 1Y
- 20.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.67%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
SWLGX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -9.81%
- 6M
- -9.30%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DTLGX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTLGX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DTLGX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
DTLGX
SWLGX
DTLGX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio (DTLGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DTLGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.83 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.35 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.17 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.53 | 4.02 | +0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DTLGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.83 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.58 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.70 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between DTLGX and SWLGX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DTLGX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
DTLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.81%, more than SWLGX's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTLGX Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio | 28.81% | 25.91% | 13.48% | 0.09% | 20.78% | 22.68% | 21.08% | 10.06% | 16.96% | 9.01% | 12.35% | 11.48% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.51% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DTLGX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTLGX drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTLGX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTLGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.57% | -32.69% | -23.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.05% | -16.16% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.84% | -32.69% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.59% | -13.03% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.92% | -7.13% | -6.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 4.69% | +0.15% |
Volatility
DTLGX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio (DTLGX) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 6.73%. This indicates that DTLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DTLGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 6.73% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.63% | 12.40% | +1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.46% | 22.57% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 21.52% | +0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.24% | 22.81% | -1.57% |