PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTLE.L vs. LUTR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTLE.L vs. LUTR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (DTLE.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (LUTR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DTLE.L is traded in EUR, while LUTR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LUTR.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTLE.L achieves a -1.71% return, which is significantly lower than LUTR.L's 0.28% return.


DTLE.L

1D
0.51%
1M
0.69%
YTD
-1.71%
6M
-1.87%
1Y
1.77%
3Y*
-3.63%
5Y*
-8.07%
10Y*

LUTR.L

1D
0.21%
1M
1.33%
YTD
0.28%
6M
-0.63%
1Y
2.59%
3Y*
-3.24%
5Y*
-4.32%
10Y*
-1.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTLE.L vs. LUTR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DTLE.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist
-1.71%2.25%-9.05%-0.58%-32.40%-5.28%15.20%12.29%-4.46%-0.11%
LUTR.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
0.28%-7.04%0.46%-0.57%-24.47%2.26%6.99%19.58%2.91%-0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DTLE.L and LUTR.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2017

0.83

The correlation between DTLE.L and LUTR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTLE.L vs. LUTR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTLE.L
DTLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
DTLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
DTLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

LUTR.L
LUTR.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LUTR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUTR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUTR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
LUTR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUTR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTLE.L vs. LUTR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (DTLE.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (LUTR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DTLE.LLUTR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.05

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

0.40

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.52

0.86

-0.34

DTLE.L vs. LUTR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTLE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the LUTR.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTLE.L and LUTR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DTLE.LLUTR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

0.29

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.54

-0.30

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

-0.09

-0.15

Drawdowns

DTLE.L vs. LUTR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTLE.L drawdown since its inception was -52.29%, which is greater than LUTR.L's maximum drawdown of -44.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTLE.L and LUTR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTLE.LLUTR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.29%

-44.33%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-6.52%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-15.90%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.70%

-36.40%

-9.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.88%

-40.69%

-7.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.92%

-22.21%

-3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

3.00%

+0.37%

Volatility

DTLE.L vs. LUTR.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (DTLE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (LUTR.L) at 2.76%. This indicates that DTLE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUTR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTLE.LLUTR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

2.76%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.73%

6.53%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.91%

9.06%

+0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.94%

14.63%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

14.35%

+1.15%

DTLE.L vs. LUTR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTLE.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LUTR.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DTLE.L vs. LUTR.L - Dividend Comparison

DTLE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than LUTR.L's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DTLE.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist
4.25%4.18%4.75%3.75%3.05%1.76%1.69%2.50%2.88%0.51%0.00%
LUTR.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.63%4.40%4.22%3.13%2.56%1.72%1.91%3.60%2.49%2.61%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTLE.L and LUTR.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DTLE.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DTLE.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for LUTR.L.

DTLE.L is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while LUTR.L is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for DTLE.L and 0.15% for LUTR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTLE.L and LUTR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer