DTLA.L vs. DBMF
DTLA.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DTLA.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. DTLA.L is passively managed, while DBMF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DTLA.L returned -6.37%/yr vs 8.01%/yr for DBMF. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. DTLA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.
Performance
DTLA.L vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTLA.L achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 10.27% return.
DTLA.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- -1.20%
- 5Y*
- -6.37%
- 10Y*
- —
DBMF
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- 1Y
- 26.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.01%
- 10Y*
- —
DTLA.L vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTLA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.86% | 4.49% | -6.90% | 1.69% | -30.29% | -4.46% | 17.00% | 11.25% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 10.27% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTLA.L and DBMF is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | -0.18 |
The correlation between DTLA.L and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (5 years) to 0.03 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTLA.L vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
DTLA.L
DBMF
DTLA.L vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DTLA.L | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.47 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 4.50 | -4.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 16.30 | -15.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DTLA.L vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTLA.L drawdown since its inception was -48.41%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTLA.L and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTLA.L | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.41% | -20.39% | -28.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.50% | -6.10% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.57% | -15.60% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.80% | -20.39% | -22.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.40% | -1.91% | -38.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.06% | -6.56% | -17.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 1.68% | +1.32% |
Volatility
DTLA.L vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.71%. This indicates that DTLA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTLA.L | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 2.71% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.74% | 10.00% | -3.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.03% | 12.35% | -2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 12.55% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.79% | 12.41% | +2.38% |
DTLA.L vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTLA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTLA.L vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
DTLA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.19% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% |
DTLA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTLA.L and DBMF have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DTLA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DTLA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.
DTLA.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for DTLA.L and 0.85% for DBMF.
Find the right allocation for DTLA.L and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer