DTLA.L vs. AGGH
DTLA.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and AGGH (Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DTLA.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index, while AGGH is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Simplify. DTLA.L is passively managed, while AGGH is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DTLA.L returned -1.20%/yr vs 4.99%/yr for AGGH. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DTLA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AGGH.
Performance
DTLA.L vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTLA.L achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than AGGH's 0.70% return.
DTLA.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- -1.20%
- 5Y*
- -6.37%
- 10Y*
- —
AGGH
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 8.76%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DTLA.L vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTLA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.86% | 4.49% | -6.90% | 1.69% | -24.26% |
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.70% | 8.23% | 1.97% | 8.47% | -8.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTLA.L and AGGH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022 | 0.52 |
The correlation between DTLA.L and AGGH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTLA.L vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank
DTLA.L
AGGH
DTLA.L vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DTLA.L | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.22 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 2.56 | -2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 7.30 | -6.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DTLA.L vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTLA.L drawdown since its inception was -48.41%, which is greater than AGGH's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTLA.L and AGGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTLA.L | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.41% | -13.26% | -35.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.50% | -3.10% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.57% | -8.67% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.40% | -1.36% | -39.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.06% | -4.43% | -19.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 1.09% | +1.91% |
Volatility
DTLA.L vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) at 1.67%. This indicates that DTLA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTLA.L | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 1.67% | +1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.74% | 3.40% | +3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.03% | 6.93% | +3.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 8.44% | +6.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.79% | 8.44% | +6.35% |
DTLA.L vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTLA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTLA.L vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison
DTLA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 7.51% | 7.54% | 8.97% | 9.51% | 2.11% |
DTLA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTLA.L and AGGH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DTLA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DTLA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AGGH.
DTLA.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while AGGH is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for DTLA.L and 0.33% for AGGH.
Find the right allocation for DTLA.L and AGGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer