DTGRX vs. DSIBX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DTGRX (BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund) and DSIBX (BNY Mellon Short-Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - DTGRX is a Technology Equities fund managed by BNY Mellon, while DSIBX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by BNY Mellon. Over the past 10 years, DTGRX returned 23.06%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for DSIBX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. DTGRX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for DSIBX.

Performance

DTGRX vs. DSIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) and BNY Mellon Short-Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (DSIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTGRX achieves a 32.96% return, which is significantly higher than DSIBX's 1.13% return. Over the past 10 years, DTGRX has outperformed DSIBX with an annualized return of 23.06%, while DSIBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.38% annualized return.

DTGRX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 17.51%
• YTD: 32.96%
• 6M: 33.80%
• 1Y: 61.91%
• 3Y*: 38.15%
• 5Y*: 15.54%
• 10Y*: 23.06%

DSIBX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 1.13%
• 6M: 1.53%
• 1Y: 3.69%
• 3Y*: 3.65%
• 5Y*: 1.41%
• 10Y*: 1.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTGRX vs. DSIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DTGRX BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund	32.96%	27.20%	30.78%	59.98%	-46.44%	12.62%	69.80%	52.82%	-1.47%	42.50%
DSIBX BNY Mellon Short-Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund	1.13%	4.53%	2.66%	3.01%	-3.79%	-0.36%	2.39%	3.27%	1.22%	1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DTGRX and DSIBX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 1997	-0.02

The correlation between DTGRX and DSIBX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DTGRX vs. DSIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTGRX

DTGRX Risk / Return Rank: 77
DTGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
DTGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
DTGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
DTGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
DTGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

DSIBX

DSIBX Risk / Return Rank: 81
DSIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
DSIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
DSIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
DSIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
DSIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTGRX vs. DSIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) and BNY Mellon Short-Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (DSIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DTGRX	DSIBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.93	3.07	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	5.89	-2.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	2.07	-0.60
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.70	3.09	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.38	9.45	+3.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DTGRX vs. DSIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is comparable to the DSIBX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTGRX and DSIBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DTGRX	DSIBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93	3.07	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.96	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.90	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	1.91	-1.47

Drawdowns

DTGRX vs. DSIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTGRX drawdown since its inception was -83.23%, which is greater than DSIBX's maximum drawdown of -6.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTGRX and DSIBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DTGRX	DSIBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.23%	-6.02%	-77.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.27%	-1.23%	-16.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.31%	-1.56%	-26.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.92%	-6.02%	-46.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.92%	-6.02%	-46.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-0.15%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.74%	-0.52%	-38.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.76%	0.40%	+4.36%

Volatility

DTGRX vs. DSIBX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to BNY Mellon Short-Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (DSIBX) at 0.45%. This indicates that DTGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DTGRX	DSIBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.34%	0.45%	+6.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.27%	0.97%	+16.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.82%	1.23%	+20.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.63%	1.47%	+27.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.99%	1.54%	+26.45%

DTGRX vs. DSIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTGRX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than DSIBX's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

DTGRX vs. DSIBX - Dividend Comparison

DTGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.06%, more than DSIBX's 2.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DSIBX BNY Mellon Short-Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund	2.53%	2.93%	2.07%	1.12%	0.62%	0.72%	1.20%	1.66%	1.29%	1.05%	0.92%	1.01%
DTGRX BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund	9.06%	12.04%	8.98%	0.00%	0.00%	21.32%	5.76%	34.25%	30.17%	9.91%	10.19%	6.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DTGRX and DSIBX in my portfolio?

DTGRX and DSIBX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DTGRX or DSIBX?

DTGRX has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to DSIBX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTGRX dropped -83.23% vs DSIBX's -6.02%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DSIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.