PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTGRX vs. DRNJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTGRX vs. DRNJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) and BNY Mellon New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund Class A (DRNJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTGRX achieves a 18.40% return, which is significantly higher than DRNJX's 0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, DTGRX has outperformed DRNJX with an annualized return of 21.29%, while DRNJX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.60% annualized return.


DTGRX

1D
6.06%
1M
-7.05%
6M
14.60%
YTD
18.40%
1Y
35.22%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
21.29%
ALL TIME*
12.59%

DRNJX

1D
-0.26%
1M
-2.10%
6M
-0.35%
YTD
0.24%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
2.85%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
1.60%
ALL TIME*
2.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DTGRX vs. DRNJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DTGRX
BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund
18.40%27.20%30.78%59.98%-46.44%12.62%69.80%52.82%-1.47%42.50%
DRNJX
BNY Mellon New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund Class A
0.24%4.00%1.68%5.55%-9.74%1.24%4.17%7.31%1.16%5.65%

Correlation

The correlation between DTGRX and DRNJX is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

-0.06

The correlation between DTGRX and DRNJX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTGRX vs. DRNJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DTGRX
DTGRX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
DTGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DTGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

DRNJX
DRNJX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DRNJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRNJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRNJX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DRNJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRNJX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DTGRX vs. DRNJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) and BNY Mellon New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund Class A (DRNJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DTGRXDRNJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.48

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

2.21

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.37

7.32

-1.95

DTGRX vs. DRNJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the DRNJX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTGRX and DRNJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DTGRX vs. DRNJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTGRX drawdown since its inception was -83.23%, which is greater than DRNJX's maximum drawdown of -14.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTGRX and DRNJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTGRXDRNJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.23%

-14.81%

-68.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.25%

-2.75%

-15.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.31%

-5.75%

-22.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.92%

-14.75%

-38.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.92%

-14.81%

-38.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.30%

-2.10%

-11.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.57%

-2.43%

-36.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.79%

0.83%

+4.96%

Volatility

DTGRX vs. DRNJX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) has a higher volatility of 11.50% compared to BNY Mellon New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund Class A (DRNJX) at 1.06%. This indicates that DTGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRNJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTGRXDRNJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.50%

1.06%

+10.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.30%

2.44%

+21.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.12%

2.99%

+25.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.65%

4.15%

+25.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.48%

4.02%

+24.46%

DTGRX vs. DRNJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTGRX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than DRNJX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTGRX vs. DRNJX - Dividend Comparison

DTGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%, more than DRNJX's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRNJX
BNY Mellon New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund Class A
2.69%3.69%2.68%2.11%2.35%1.85%2.56%3.73%4.41%3.13%3.33%3.38%
DTGRX
BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund
10.17%12.04%8.98%0.00%0.00%21.32%5.76%34.25%30.17%9.91%10.19%6.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTGRX and DRNJX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTGRX has higher volatility (11.50%) compared to DRNJX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTGRX dropped -83.23% vs DRNJX's -14.81%.

DRNJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTGRX and DRNJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer