PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTGRX vs. DNLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTGRX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTGRX achieves a 32.96% return, which is significantly higher than DNLDX's 11.62% return. Over the past 10 years, DTGRX has outperformed DNLDX with an annualized return of 23.06%, while DNLDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.00% annualized return.


DTGRX

1D
-0.31%
1M
17.51%
YTD
32.96%
6M
33.80%
1Y
61.91%
3Y*
38.15%
5Y*
15.54%
10Y*
23.06%

DNLDX

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.52%
YTD
11.62%
6M
11.64%
1Y
21.35%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTGRX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DTGRX
BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund
32.96%27.20%30.78%59.98%-46.44%12.62%69.80%52.82%-1.47%42.50%
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
11.62%9.79%22.27%16.99%-14.34%26.49%9.29%16.82%-14.46%16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between DTGRX and DNLDX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 1997

0.80

The correlation between DTGRX and DNLDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTGRX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTGRX
DTGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DTGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DTGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DNLDX
DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTGRX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DTGRXDNLDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.28

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

2.88

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.38

10.82

+2.56

DTGRX vs. DNLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is higher than the DNLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTGRX and DNLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DTGRXDNLDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

1.60

+1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.56

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.51

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.55

-0.11

Drawdowns

DTGRX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTGRX drawdown since its inception was -83.23%, which is greater than DNLDX's maximum drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTGRX and DNLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTGRXDNLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.23%

-63.69%

-19.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.27%

-7.29%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.31%

-20.42%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.92%

-23.42%

-29.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.92%

-42.23%

-10.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.09%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.74%

-9.63%

-29.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

1.94%

+2.82%

Volatility

DTGRX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) at 3.34%. This indicates that DTGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTGRXDNLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.34%

3.34%

+4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.27%

9.53%

+7.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.82%

13.10%

+8.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.63%

18.48%

+10.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.99%

19.51%

+8.48%

DTGRX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTGRX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTGRX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison

DTGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.06%, less than DNLDX's 13.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
13.46%14.15%15.24%1.69%8.82%17.74%2.77%2.65%11.14%11.32%1.00%3.12%
DTGRX
BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund
9.06%12.04%8.98%0.00%0.00%21.32%5.76%34.25%30.17%9.91%10.19%6.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTGRX and DNLDX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTGRX has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to DNLDX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTGRX dropped -83.23% vs DNLDX's -63.69%.

DTGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTGRX and DNLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer