DTD vs. MOO
DTD (WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DTD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Index, while MOO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DTD returned 12.37%/yr vs 7.00%/yr for MOO. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DTD charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MOO.
Performance
DTD vs. MOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTD achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than MOO's 5.15% return. Over the past 10 years, DTD has outperformed MOO with an annualized return of 12.37%, while MOO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.00% annualized return.
DTD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 21.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
MOO
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 5.15%
- 6M
- 5.57%
- 1Y
- 6.63%
- 3Y*
- 1.24%
- 5Y*
- -1.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.00%
DTD vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTD WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund | 10.39% | 14.25% | 18.56% | 10.63% | -3.83% | 26.26% | 2.45% | 28.19% | -6.47% | 17.35% |
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 5.15% | 15.61% | -12.43% | -8.57% | -8.10% | 23.99% | 14.59% | 22.29% | -6.03% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTD and MOO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007 | 0.73 |
The correlation between DTD and MOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.76 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DTD vs. MOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DTD
MOO
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
DTD
MOO
-
Financial Services
DTD
MOO
-
Healthcare
DTD
MOO
Industrials
DTD
MOO
Consumer Defensive
DTD
MOO
Energy
DTD
MOO
-
Communication Services
DTD
MOO
-
Utilities
DTD
MOO
-
Consumer Cyclical
DTD
MOO
-
Real Estate
DTD
MOO
-
Basic Materials
DTD
MOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTD vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank
DTD
MOO
DTD vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DTD | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.09 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 0.60 | +2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.00 | 1.66 | +12.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DTD vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTD drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTD and MOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTD | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.19% | -69.53% | +11.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.30% | -11.17% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.41% | -26.83% | +12.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.14% | -39.52% | +23.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.29% | -39.52% | +2.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -21.21% | +20.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -16.97% | +9.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 4.01% | -2.49% |
Volatility
DTD vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) is 2.65%, while VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that DTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTD | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 3.32% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.13% | 10.83% | -3.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.41% | 14.06% | -4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 17.13% | -3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 18.14% | -1.95% |
DTD vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTD has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTD vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison
DTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than MOO's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTD WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund | 1.86% | 1.99% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 2.62% | 2.04% | 2.73% | 2.50% | 2.93% | 2.36% | 2.66% | 2.81% |
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 2.35% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 2.93% | 2.15% | 1.17% | 1.10% | 1.26% | 1.69% | 1.44% | 2.14% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTD and MOO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOO has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to DTD (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTD dropped -58.19% vs MOO's -69.53%.
On 10-year performance, DTD leads with 12.37% vs 7.00% for MOO. On fees, DTD is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DTD has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DTD has performed better with a 12.37% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DTD is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MOO.
MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.86% for DTD.
DTD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MOO is Large Cap Blend Equities. DTD tracks WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Index, while MOO tracks MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DTD and 0.55% for MOO.
DTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DTD and MOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer