DTD vs. FNDX
DTD (WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - DTD tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Index while FNDX tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DTD returned 11.90%/yr vs 14.02%/yr for FNDX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DTD charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
DTD vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTD achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, DTD has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 11.90%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.02% annualized return.
DTD
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
FNDX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 12.72%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 13.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
DTD vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTD WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund | 12.27% | 14.25% | 18.56% | 10.63% | -3.83% | 26.26% | 2.45% | 28.19% | -6.47% | 17.35% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 16.45% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -6.92% | 31.73% | 9.12% | 28.65% | -7.30% | 17.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTD and FNDX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.95 |
The correlation between DTD and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
DTD vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DTD
FNDX
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DTD
FNDX
Financial Services
DTD
FNDX
Healthcare
DTD
FNDX
Industrials
DTD
FNDX
Consumer Defensive
DTD
FNDX
Energy
DTD
FNDX
Communication Services
DTD
FNDX
Utilities
DTD
FNDX
Consumer Cyclical
DTD
FNDX
Real Estate
DTD
FNDX
Basic Materials
DTD
FNDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTD vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
DTD
FNDX
DTD vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DTD | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.51 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 4.70 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.72 | 18.23 | -5.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DTD vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTD drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTD and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTD | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.19% | -37.72% | -20.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.30% | -6.06% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.41% | -16.30% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.14% | -19.06% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.29% | -37.72% | +0.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.13% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.30% | -3.54% | -3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 1.56% | -0.04% |
Volatility
DTD vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) is 2.10%, while Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) has a volatility of 2.22%. This indicates that DTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTD | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.10% | 2.22% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.01% | 7.40% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.26% | 10.31% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.55% | 15.13% | -1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 17.44% | -1.28% |
DTD vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTD has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTD vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
DTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than FNDX's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTD WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund | 1.83% | 1.99% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 2.62% | 2.04% | 2.73% | 2.50% | 2.93% | 2.36% | 2.66% | 2.81% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.47% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTD and FNDX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNDX has higher volatility (2.22%) compared to DTD (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTD dropped -58.19% vs FNDX's -37.72%.
On 10-year performance, FNDX leads with 14.02% vs 11.90% for DTD. On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DTD has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 14.02% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DTD.
DTD has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.47% for FNDX.
DTD tracks WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DTD and 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DTD and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer