PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTD vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTD vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTD achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, DTD has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 11.90%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.02% annualized return.


DTD

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.15%
6M
9.92%
YTD
12.27%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
17.28%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
11.90%

FNDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.83%
6M
12.72%
YTD
16.45%
1Y
28.36%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
13.69%
10Y*
14.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTD vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DTD
WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund
12.27%14.25%18.56%10.63%-3.83%26.26%2.45%28.19%-6.47%17.35%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
16.45%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%31.73%9.12%28.65%-7.30%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DTD and FNDX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.95

The correlation between DTD and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

DTD vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DTD
FNDX

Technology

20.9%
22.1%

Financial Services

18.2%
13.3%

Healthcare

11.5%
11.9%

Industrials

8.4%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
7.0%

Energy

7.8%
9.3%

Communication Services

7.2%
9.9%

Utilities

5.5%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
9.1%

Real Estate

5.1%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.5%
3.6%

Technology

DTD
20.9%
FNDX
22.1%

Financial Services

DTD
18.2%
FNDX
13.3%

Healthcare

DTD
11.5%
FNDX
11.9%

Industrials

DTD
8.4%
FNDX
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

DTD
8.4%
FNDX
7.0%

Energy

DTD
7.8%
FNDX
9.3%

Communication Services

DTD
7.2%
FNDX
9.9%

Utilities

DTD
5.5%
FNDX
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DTD
5.5%
FNDX
9.1%

Real Estate

DTD
5.1%
FNDX
1.7%

Basic Materials

DTD
1.5%
FNDX
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTD vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTD
DTD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTD Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTD vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DTDFNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.51

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

4.70

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

18.23

-5.50

DTD vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTD Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTD and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DTD vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTD drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTD and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTDFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.19%

-37.72%

-20.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.30%

-6.06%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.41%

-16.30%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

-19.06%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.29%

-37.72%

+0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.13%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.30%

-3.54%

-3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

1.56%

-0.04%

Volatility

DTD vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) is 2.10%, while Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) has a volatility of 2.22%. This indicates that DTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTDFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

2.22%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.01%

7.40%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.26%

10.31%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.55%

15.13%

-1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

17.44%

-1.28%

DTD vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTD has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTD vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

DTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than FNDX's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTD
WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund
1.83%1.99%2.07%2.43%2.62%2.04%2.73%2.50%2.93%2.36%2.66%2.81%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.47%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTD and FNDX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDX has higher volatility (2.22%) compared to DTD (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTD dropped -58.19% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

On 10-year performance, FNDX leads with 14.02% vs 11.90% for DTD. On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DTD has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 14.02% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DTD.

DTD has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.47% for FNDX.

DTD tracks WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DTD and 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTD and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer