DSY.PA vs. MC.PA
DSY.PA (Dassault Systèmes SE) and MC.PA (LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne) are both stocks. DSY.PA operates in Software - Application (Technology), while MC.PA operates in Luxury Goods (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, DSY.PA returned 4.34%/yr vs 16.10%/yr for MC.PA. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DSY.PA vs. MC.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSY.PA achieves a -26.84% return, which is significantly lower than MC.PA's -19.55% return. Over the past 10 years, DSY.PA has underperformed MC.PA with an annualized return of 4.34%, while MC.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 16.10% annualized return.
DSY.PA
- 1D
- -5.44%
- 1M
- -8.59%
- YTD
- -26.84%
- 6M
- -25.81%
- 1Y
- -45.66%
- 3Y*
- -24.55%
- 5Y*
- -14.23%
- 10Y*
- 4.34%
MC.PA
- 1D
- 3.53%
- 1M
- 12.89%
- YTD
- -19.55%
- 6M
- -16.91%
- 1Y
- 11.64%
- 3Y*
- -13.46%
- 5Y*
- -3.38%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
DSY.PA vs. MC.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSY.PA Dassault Systèmes SE | -26.84% | -28.28% | -23.83% | 32.78% | -35.69% | 59.82% | 16.14% | 44.84% | 20.04% | 26.45% |
MC.PA LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | -19.55% | 3.93% | -11.73% | 9.60% | -4.76% | 43.83% | 24.66% | 63.17% | 7.31% | 37.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSY.PA and MC.PA is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2006 | 0.48 |
The correlation between DSY.PA and MC.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSY.PA vs. MC.PA — Risk / Return Rank
DSY.PA
MC.PA
DSY.PA vs. MC.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dassault Systèmes SE (DSY.PA) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DSY.PA | MC.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.09 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 0.37 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 0.74 | -2.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DSY.PA vs. MC.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSY.PA drawdown since its inception was -70.94%, which is greater than MC.PA's maximum drawdown of -54.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSY.PA and MC.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSY.PA | MC.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.94% | -54.74% | -16.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.59% | -30.65% | -19.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.60% | -48.87% | -17.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.94% | -49.03% | -21.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.94% | -49.03% | -21.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.24% | -39.02% | -29.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.04% | -12.08% | -1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.61% | 15.58% | +14.03% |
Volatility
DSY.PA vs. MC.PA - Volatility Comparison
Dassault Systèmes SE (DSY.PA) has a higher volatility of 15.84% compared to LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) at 7.96%. This indicates that DSY.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MC.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSY.PA | MC.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.84% | 7.96% | +7.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.30% | 21.54% | +13.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.87% | 31.28% | +7.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.59% | 29.90% | +0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.49% | 27.93% | +0.56% |
Dividends
DSY.PA vs. MC.PA - Dividend Comparison
DSY.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than MC.PA's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSY.PA Dassault Systèmes SE | 1.57% | 1.09% | 0.69% | 0.47% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 2.11% | 2.22% | 2.80% | 2.99% | 3.25% | 2.92% |
MC.PA LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | 2.55% | 2.02% | 2.05% | 1.70% | 1.76% | 0.96% | 0.90% | 1.50% | 2.09% | 1.71% | 1.98% | 2.28% |
Financials
DSY.PA vs. MC.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dassault Systèmes SE and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
DSY.PA and MC.PA have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DSY.PA and MC.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer