PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSVSF vs. SILJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DSVSF vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Discovery Silver Corp (DSVSF) and ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DSVSF vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DSVSF
Discovery Silver Corp
4.88%1,173.33%-16.38%-42.60%-39.39%7.84%194.37%148.77%-25.11%
SILJ
ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF
7.41%183.89%6.39%-5.21%-15.42%-23.21%33.00%57.06%-10.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSVSF achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's 7.41% return.


DSVSF

1D
6.83%
1M
-22.30%
YTD
4.88%
6M
72.50%
1Y
335.03%
3Y*
86.49%
5Y*
29.06%
10Y*

SILJ

1D
8.82%
1M
-26.25%
YTD
7.41%
6M
31.14%
1Y
149.83%
3Y*
42.89%
5Y*
16.70%
10Y*
14.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSVSF vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSVSF
DSVSF Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DSVSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSVSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSVSF Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DSVSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSVSF Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

SILJ
SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSVSF vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Discovery Silver Corp (DSVSF) and ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DSVSFSILJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.14

2.74

+1.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.53

2.83

+0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.40

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.06

4.26

+4.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

29.11

14.55

+14.56

DSVSF vs. SILJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSVSF Sharpe Ratio is 4.14, which is higher than the SILJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSVSF and SILJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DSVSFSILJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14

2.74

+1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.38

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.09

+0.60

Correlation

The correlation between DSVSF and SILJ is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DSVSF vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

DSVSF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSVSF
Discovery Silver Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SILJ
ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF
1.86%2.00%7.26%0.01%0.05%0.36%1.23%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.52%2.46%

Drawdowns

DSVSF vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSVSF drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, roughly equal to the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSVSF and SILJ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DSVSFSILJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.65%

-79.04%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.74%

-34.71%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.65%

-56.09%

-25.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.24%

-26.25%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.12%

-41.67%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.75%

10.16%

+1.59%

Volatility

DSVSF vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison

Discovery Silver Corp (DSVSF) has a higher volatility of 24.04% compared to ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) at 21.63%. This indicates that DSVSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DSVSFSILJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.04%

21.63%

+2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.55%

46.79%

+14.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

81.53%

54.97%

+26.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.27%

44.07%

+31.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

86.05%

46.61%

+39.44%