DSTX vs. KEMX
DSTX (Distillate International Fundamental Stability & Value ETF) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DSTX tracks the Distillate Fundamental Stability & Value Index while KEMX tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DSTX returned 6.83%/yr vs 13.24%/yr for KEMX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DSTX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.
Performance
DSTX vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSTX achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 40.51% return.
DSTX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 7.76%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 28.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- —
KEMX
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 8.82%
- YTD
- 40.51%
- 6M
- 46.50%
- 1Y
- 75.91%
- 3Y*
- 29.24%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- —
DSTX vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSTX Distillate International Fundamental Stability & Value ETF | 7.76% | 41.71% | -0.44% | 20.03% | -18.85% | 1.78% | 2.03% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 40.51% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 20.57% | -19.35% | 10.55% | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSTX and KEMX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2020 | 0.82 |
The correlation between DSTX and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
DSTX vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DSTX
KEMX
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
DSTX
KEMX
Industrials
DSTX
KEMX
Basic Materials
DSTX
KEMX
Consumer Cyclical
DSTX
KEMX
Healthcare
DSTX
KEMX
Consumer Defensive
DSTX
KEMX
Communication Services
DSTX
KEMX
Energy
DSTX
KEMX
Financial Services
DSTX
KEMX
Real Estate
DSTX
-
KEMX
Utilities
DSTX
-
KEMX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSTX vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank
DSTX
KEMX
DSTX vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Distillate International Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTX) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DSTX | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.59 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 4.97 | -2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.28 | 19.78 | -11.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DSTX | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 3.40 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.73 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.67 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
DSTX vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSTX drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSTX and KEMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSTX | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.67% | -38.80% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.48% | -15.36% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.29% | -19.62% | +6.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.67% | -30.85% | -2.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.51% | -2.52% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.97% | -8.85% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 3.85% | -0.43% |
Volatility
DSTX vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Distillate International Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTX) is 4.47%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 9.80%. This indicates that DSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSTX | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 9.80% | -5.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 19.96% | -7.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.72% | 22.44% | -6.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 18.21% | -1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 20.94% | -4.13% |
DSTX vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSTX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSTX vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison
DSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than KEMX's 2.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSTX Distillate International Fundamental Stability & Value ETF | 2.70% | 2.93% | 2.41% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 2.24% | 0.07% | 0.00% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 2.33% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSTX and KEMX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEMX has higher volatility (9.80%) compared to DSTX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSTX dropped -33.67% vs KEMX's -38.80%.
On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.24% vs 6.83% for DSTX. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DSTX has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 6.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DSTX.
DSTX has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 2.33% for KEMX.
DSTX tracks Distillate Fundamental Stability & Value Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Distillate Capital and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DSTX and 0.25% for KEMX.
KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSTX and KEMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer