DSTL vs. DIVB
DSTL (Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF) and DIVB (iShares Core Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DSTL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Distillate Capital, while DIVB is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. DSTL is actively managed, while DIVB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DSTL returned 9.70%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for DIVB. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DSTL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for DIVB.
Performance
DSTL vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSTL achieves a 6.94% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 22.13% return.
DSTL
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 4.46%
- YTD
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 13.22%
- 3Y*
- 12.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVB
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- 6M
- 19.39%
- YTD
- 22.13%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- —
DSTL vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSTL Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF | 6.94% | 8.71% | 12.78% | 22.71% | -10.64% | 28.87% | 19.31% | 35.49% | -8.42% |
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 22.13% | 15.09% | 18.59% | 13.27% | -10.51% | 31.29% | 10.78% | 32.72% | -7.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSTL and DIVB is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between DSTL and DIVB shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSTL vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank
DSTL
DIVB
DSTL vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DSTL | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.44 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 4.30 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 14.43 | -9.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DSTL vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSTL drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, smaller than the maximum DIVB drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSTL and DIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSTL | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.09% | -36.93% | +3.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -6.82% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.92% | -15.45% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.10% | -21.08% | +0.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -4.94% | +0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.03% | +0.88% |
Volatility
DSTL vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison
Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) at 3.92%. This indicates that DSTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSTL | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 3.92% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 9.02% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 11.90% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 15.30% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 18.34% | +1.02% |
DSTL vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSTL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSTL vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison
DSTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than DIVB's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 2.17% | 2.50% | 2.61% | 3.18% | 2.02% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 2.07% | 2.52% | 0.37% |
DSTL Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.34% | 1.30% | 1.35% | 1.01% | 0.83% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSTL and DIVB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DSTL has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to DIVB (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSTL dropped -33.09% vs DIVB's -36.93%.
On 5-year performance, DIVB leads with 12.91% vs 9.70% for DSTL. On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DIVB has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVB has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DSTL.
DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.18% for DSTL.
DSTL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIVB is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Distillate Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DSTL and 0.05% for DIVB.
DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSTL and DIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer