DSPY vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DSPY (Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DSPY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tema, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. DSPY is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, DSPY returned 26.81% vs 4.57% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. DSPY charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

DSPY vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSPY achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.70% return.

DSPY

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 5.59%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 6M: 12.63%
• 1Y: 26.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 4.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSPY vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DSPY Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy	12.26%	18.46%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.70%	2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DSPY and RBIL is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025	-0.21

Return for Risk

DSPY vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSPY

DSPY Risk / Return Rank: 75
DSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
DSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
DSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 72
DSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
DSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 82

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 98
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSPY vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DSPY	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	5.01	-2.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	7.92	-4.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	2.39	-0.96
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	17.00	-13.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.34	70.66	-54.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DSPY vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSPY and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DSPY	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	5.01	-2.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.68	4.28	-2.60

Drawdowns

DSPY vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSPY drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSPY and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DSPY	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.15%	-0.50%	-11.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.55%	-0.27%	-7.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	0.00%	-0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.25%	-0.06%	-1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	0.07%	+1.57%

Volatility

DSPY vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that DSPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DSPY	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	0.30%	+2.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.52%	0.79%	+7.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.21%	0.92%	+10.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.53%	1.05%	+15.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.53%	1.05%	+15.48%

DSPY vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSPY has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DSPY vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

DSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
DSPY Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy	0.74%	0.72%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.60%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DSPY and RBIL in my portfolio?

DSPY and RBIL have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DSPY or RBIL?

DSPY has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSPY dropped -12.15% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

Which ETF is better, DSPY or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, DSPY leads with 26.81% vs 4.57% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DSPY or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, DSPY has performed better with a 26.81% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DSPY or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for DSPY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DSPY or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.74% for DSPY.

What is the main difference between DSPY and RBIL?

DSPY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Tema and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DSPY and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.