DSPY vs. IUS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DSPY (Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy) and IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DSPY is actively managed, while IUS is passively managed. Over the past year, DSPY returned 26.81% vs 33.27% for IUS. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DSPY charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IUS.

Performance

DSPY vs. IUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSPY achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly lower than IUS's 15.71% return.

DSPY

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 5.59%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 6M: 12.63%
• 1Y: 26.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IUS

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 4.89%
• YTD: 15.71%
• 6M: 15.69%
• 1Y: 33.27%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 13.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSPY vs. IUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DSPY Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy	12.26%	18.46%
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	15.71%	17.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DSPY and IUS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025	0.93

The correlation between DSPY and IUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

DSPY vs. IUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DSPY	IUS
Technology	28.8%	22.4%
Financial Services	14.2%	6.8%
Industrials	10.8%	9.7%
Healthcare	10.6%	12.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	10.7%
Communication Services	7.7%	14.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	7.4%
Energy	4.4%	10.9%
Utilities	3.0%	1.0%
Real Estate	2.5%	0.5%
Basic Materials	2.3%	3.3%

Return for Risk

DSPY vs. IUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSPY

DSPY Risk / Return Rank: 75
DSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
DSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
DSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 72
DSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
DSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 82

IUS

IUS Risk / Return Rank: 91
IUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
IUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
IUS Omega Ratio Rank: 90
IUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IUS Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSPY vs. IUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DSPY	IUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	3.26	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	4.53	-1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.60	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	5.44	-1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.34	23.27	-6.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DSPY vs. IUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the IUS Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSPY and IUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DSPY	IUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	3.26	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.68	0.85	+0.83

Drawdowns

DSPY vs. IUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSPY drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum IUS drawdown of -34.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSPY and IUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DSPY	IUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.15%	-34.67%	+22.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.55%	-6.15%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.07%	-0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.25%	-3.86%	+2.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	1.43%	+0.21%

Volatility

DSPY vs. IUS - Volatility Comparison

Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) at 2.50%. This indicates that DSPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DSPY	IUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	2.50%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.52%	7.41%	+1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.21%	10.26%	+0.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.53%	15.00%	+1.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.53%	18.04%	-1.51%

DSPY vs. IUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSPY has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IUS's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DSPY vs. IUS - Dividend Comparison

DSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than IUS's 1.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DSPY Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy	0.74%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	1.28%	1.48%	1.52%	1.72%	1.78%	1.46%	1.74%	1.77%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DSPY and IUS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, DSPY and IUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DSPY or IUS?

DSPY has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to IUS (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSPY dropped -12.15% vs IUS's -34.67%.

Which ETF is better, DSPY or IUS?

On 1-year performance, IUS leads with 33.27% vs 26.81% for DSPY. On fees, DSPY is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DSPY or IUS?

Over the 1-year period, IUS has performed better with a 33.27% return vs 26.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DSPY or IUS?

DSPY is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DSPY or IUS?

IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.74% for DSPY.

What is the main difference between DSPY and IUS?

They also come from different issuers: Tema and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DSPY and 0.19% for IUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.