DSMC vs. XMVM
DSMC (Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF) and XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DSMC is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Distillate, while XMVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. DSMC is actively managed, while XMVM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DSMC returned 13.36%/yr vs 18.89%/yr for XMVM. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DSMC charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XMVM.
Performance
DSMC vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSMC achieves a 12.84% return, which is significantly higher than XMVM's 8.00% return.
DSMC
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 12.84%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 27.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMVM
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- 1Y
- 29.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.89%
- 5Y*
- 9.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
DSMC vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSMC Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF | 12.84% | 2.73% | 2.81% | 29.50% | 8.68% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 8.00% | 18.46% | 11.73% | 16.31% | 7.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSMC and XMVM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022 | 0.88 |
The correlation between DSMC and XMVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DSMC vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DSMC
XMVM
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Technology
DSMC
XMVM
Consumer Cyclical
DSMC
XMVM
Industrials
DSMC
XMVM
Energy
DSMC
XMVM
Communication Services
DSMC
XMVM
Healthcare
DSMC
XMVM
Consumer Defensive
DSMC
XMVM
Financial Services
DSMC
XMVM
Basic Materials
DSMC
XMVM
Real Estate
DSMC
XMVM
Utilities
DSMC
-
XMVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSMC vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank
DSMC
XMVM
DSMC vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF (DSMC) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DSMC | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.34 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 3.19 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | 9.86 | -1.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DSMC | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 1.91 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.43 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
DSMC vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSMC drawdown since its inception was -28.62%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSMC and XMVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSMC | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.62% | -62.83% | +34.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.33% | -9.18% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.62% | -24.12% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -1.21% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -10.27% | +4.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 2.97% | +0.13% |
Volatility
DSMC vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison
Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF (DSMC) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.38%. This indicates that DSMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSMC | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 3.38% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 9.77% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.33% | 15.37% | +1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 21.54% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 22.80% | -2.41% |
DSMC vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSMC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSMC vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison
DSMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than XMVM's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSMC Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF | 1.13% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.02% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.73% | 2.87% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 2.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSMC and XMVM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DSMC has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to XMVM (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSMC dropped -28.62% vs XMVM's -62.83%.
On 3-year performance, XMVM leads with 18.89% vs 13.36% for DSMC. On fees, XMVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XMVM has performed better with a 18.89% return vs 13.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DSMC.
XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.13% for DSMC.
DSMC is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XMVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Distillate and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DSMC and 0.39% for XMVM.
XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSMC and XMVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer