DSMC vs. RPV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DSMC (Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF) and RPV (Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DSMC is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Distillate, while RPV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Pure Value Index. DSMC is actively managed, while RPV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DSMC returned 11.31%/yr vs 17.61%/yr for RPV. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DSMC charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPV.

Performance

DSMC vs. RPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF (DSMC) and Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSMC achieves a 20.82% return, which is significantly higher than RPV's 17.44% return.

DSMC

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 3.93%
• 6M: 13.71%
• YTD: 20.82%
• 1Y: 31.37%
• 3Y*: 11.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.53%

RPV

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 3.56%
• 6M: 12.64%
• YTD: 17.44%
• 1Y: 35.26%
• 3Y*: 17.61%
• 5Y*: 12.61%
• 10Y*: 11.04%
• ALL TIME*: 9.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DSMC Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF	$134.46K	$196.71K	$205.16K
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF	$16.35M	$15.45M	$15.92M

DSMC vs. RPV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DSMC Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF	20.82%	2.73%	2.81%	29.50%	8.50%
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF	17.44%	17.70%	12.41%	7.98%	5.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DSMC and RPV is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2022	0.83

The correlation between DSMC and RPV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

DSMC vs. RPV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DSMC	RPV
Consumer Cyclical	16.9%	11.4%
Industrials	16.8%	7.3%
Technology	16.0%	3.4%
Energy	13.4%	9.6%
Healthcare	11.7%	18.3%
Consumer Defensive	9.8%	13.0%
Basic Materials	5.2%	7.5%
Communication Services	4.9%	5.2%
Financial Services	4.2%	18.8%
Real Estate	0.4%	1.6%
Utilities	-	4.1%

Return for Risk

DSMC vs. RPV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DSMC

DSMC Risk / Return Rank: 77
DSMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
DSMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DSMC Omega Ratio Rank: 73
DSMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
DSMC Martin Ratio Rank: 76

RPV

RPV Risk / Return Rank: 94
RPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
RPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
RPV Omega Ratio Rank: 93
RPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RPV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DSMC vs. RPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF (DSMC) and Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DSMC	RPV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	2.85	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	4.07	-1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.49	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	4.58	-1.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.69	16.83	-7.14

DSMC vs. RPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the RPV Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSMC and RPV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DSMC vs. RPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSMC drawdown since its inception was -28.62%, smaller than the maximum RPV drawdown of -75.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSMC and RPV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DSMC	RPV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.62%	-75.32%	+46.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.33%	-7.74%	-2.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.62%	-14.90%	-13.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.64%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-1.05%	-0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.79%	-10.61%	+4.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	2.10%	+0.91%

Volatility

DSMC vs. RPV - Volatility Comparison

Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF (DSMC) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) at 3.10%. This indicates that DSMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DSMC	RPV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	3.10%	+1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.47%	8.22%	+2.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.74%	12.43%	+4.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.18%	17.60%	+2.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.18%	21.80%	-1.62%

DSMC vs. RPV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSMC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RPV's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

DSMC vs. RPV - Dividend Comparison

DSMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than RPV's 2.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DSMC Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF	1.09%	1.18%	1.31%	1.02%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF	2.26%	2.50%	2.16%	2.38%	2.29%	1.92%	2.11%	2.28%	2.49%	1.73%	1.73%	2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DSMC and RPV in my portfolio?

DSMC and RPV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DSMC or RPV?

DSMC has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to RPV (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSMC dropped -28.62% vs RPV's -75.32%.

Which ETF is better, DSMC or RPV?

On 3-year performance, RPV leads with 17.61% vs 11.31% for DSMC. On fees, RPV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RPV has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DSMC or RPV?

Over the 3-year period, RPV has performed better with a 17.61% return vs 11.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DSMC or RPV?

RPV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DSMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DSMC or RPV?

RPV has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 1.09% for DSMC.

What is the main difference between DSMC and RPV?

DSMC is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while RPV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Distillate and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DSMC and 0.35% for RPV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.