DSL vs. BMEZ
DSL (DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund) is High Yield Bonds fund managed by DoubleLine, while BMEZ (BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, DSL returned 0.87%/yr vs -3.85%/yr for BMEZ. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DSL vs. BMEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSL achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than BMEZ's -1.89% return.
DSL
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- -0.92%
- 3Y*
- 8.54%
- 5Y*
- 0.87%
- 10Y*
- 5.21%
BMEZ
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- -1.89%
- 6M
- -3.49%
- 1Y
- 6.83%
- 3Y*
- 6.74%
- 5Y*
- -3.85%
- 10Y*
- —
DSL vs. BMEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSL DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund | 1.29% | -0.01% | 15.00% | 23.41% | -22.61% | 7.39% | -10.18% |
BMEZ BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II | -1.89% | 18.69% | 9.54% | 5.07% | -32.65% | -6.00% | 48.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSL and BMEZ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2020 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSL vs. BMEZ — Risk / Return Rank
DSL
BMEZ
DSL vs. BMEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) and BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II (BMEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DSL | BMEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.09 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 0.61 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | 1.51 | -1.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DSL | BMEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | 0.45 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | -0.19 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.16 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
DSL vs. BMEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSL drawdown since its inception was -49.51%, which is greater than BMEZ's maximum drawdown of -46.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSL and BMEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSL | BMEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.51% | -46.19% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.16% | -11.24% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.43% | -18.41% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.18% | -46.17% | +11.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.46% | -21.30% | +14.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -24.16% | +15.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.59% | 4.56% | +1.03% |
Volatility
DSL vs. BMEZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) is 3.53%, while BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II (BMEZ) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that DSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSL | BMEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 5.13% | -1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.56% | 11.52% | -3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.28% | 15.28% | -6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 19.91% | -5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 24.15% | -4.05% |
Dividends
DSL vs. BMEZ - Dividend Comparison
DSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.14%, more than BMEZ's 10.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMEZ BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II | 10.86% | 12.43% | 11.74% | 10.80% | 11.28% | 6.51% | 3.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DSL DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund | 12.14% | 11.71% | 11.38% | 10.78% | 13.67% | 10.74% | 10.69% | 9.33% | 10.39% | 9.11% | 9.53% | 11.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSL and BMEZ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMEZ has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to DSL (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSL dropped -49.51% vs BMEZ's -46.19%.
BMEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSL and BMEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer