DSI vs. BBUS
DSI (iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DSI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI KLD 400 Social Index, while BBUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DSI returned 12.35%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for BBUS. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DSI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
DSI vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSI achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 7.57% return.
DSI
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- 1Y
- 24.79%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
BBUS
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 6.62%
- 1Y
- 22.78%
- 3Y*
- 20.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- —
DSI vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSI iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF | 8.47% | 18.03% | 22.38% | 28.51% | -21.71% | 31.32% | 20.94% | 16.84% |
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 7.57% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSI and BBUS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019 | 0.98 |
The correlation between DSI and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
DSI vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DSI
BBUS
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
DSI
BBUS
Communication Services
DSI
BBUS
Financial Services
DSI
BBUS
Industrials
DSI
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
DSI
BBUS
Healthcare
DSI
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
DSI
BBUS
Real Estate
DSI
BBUS
Basic Materials
DSI
BBUS
Energy
DSI
BBUS
Utilities
DSI
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSI vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
DSI
BBUS
DSI vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DSI | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.33 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 2.49 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | 10.97 | -1.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DSI vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSI drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSI and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSI | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.23% | -35.35% | -18.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.05% | -9.21% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.58% | -19.01% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.36% | -25.46% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -3.47% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.51% | -5.43% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 2.08% | +0.60% |
Volatility
DSI vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 5.00%. This indicates that DSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSI | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 5.00% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.08% | 9.95% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.79% | 12.59% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 17.14% | +0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 19.59% | -0.86% |
DSI vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DSI vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
DSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than BBUS's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DSI iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF | 0.89% | 0.92% | 1.03% | 1.19% | 1.39% | 0.99% | 1.22% | 1.40% | 1.63% | 1.28% | 1.51% | 1.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DSI and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DSI has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to BBUS (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSI dropped -54.23% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.52% vs 12.35% for DSI. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DSI.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.89% for DSI.
DSI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. DSI tracks MSCI KLD 400 Social Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DSI and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSI and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer