PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSG.TO vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DSG.TO vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (DSG.TO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DSG.TO is traded in CAD, while COST is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COST values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSG.TO achieves a -10.02% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 14.80% return. Over the past 10 years, DSG.TO has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 15.09%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.51% annualized return.


DSG.TO

1D
5.31%
1M
11.55%
YTD
-10.02%
6M
-15.53%
1Y
-22.03%
3Y*
1.36%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
15.09%

COST

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
14.80%
6M
9.90%
1Y
-1.44%
3Y*
26.78%
5Y*
25.04%
10Y*
23.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSG.TO vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSG.TO
The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
-10.02%-26.31%46.77%17.95%-9.78%40.52%34.14%54.04%0.81%24.83%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
14.80%-9.73%51.62%45.72%-13.28%50.45%30.42%38.54%19.98%14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between DSG.TO and COST is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009

0.20

The correlation between DSG.TO and COST shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

DSG.TO:

CA$1.88

COST:

$26.51

PE Ratio

DSG.TO:

57.69

COST:

36.67

PEG Ratio

DSG.TO:

3.26

COST:

2.87

PS Ratio

DSG.TO:

12.96

COST:

1.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

DSG.TO:

CA$732.06M

COST:

$293.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DSG.TO:

CA$543.10M

COST:

$11.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

DSG.TO:

CA$310.05M

COST:

$12.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSG.TO vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSG.TO
DSG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
DSG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
DSG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSG.TO vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (DSG.TO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DSG.TOCOSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.00

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

-0.09

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

-0.23

-1.10

DSG.TO vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSG.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSG.TO and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DSG.TOCOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.80

-0.07

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

1.14

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

1.09

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

1.19

-0.99

Drawdowns

DSG.TO vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSG.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.00%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSG.TO and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSG.TOCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.00%

-30.06%

-68.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.44%

-15.67%

-26.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.94%

-23.23%

-27.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.94%

-30.06%

-20.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.94%

-30.06%

-20.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.21%

-10.74%

-27.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.76%

-5.61%

-64.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.33%

6.41%

+20.92%

Volatility

DSG.TO vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (DSG.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.54% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 7.98%. This indicates that DSG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSG.TOCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.54%

7.98%

+7.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.35%

15.21%

+17.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.41%

19.81%

+19.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.86%

22.05%

+7.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.79%

21.61%

+7.18%

Dividends

DSG.TO vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

DSG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.55%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
DSG.TO
The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

DSG.TO vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Descartes Systems Group Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
195.83M
70.53B
(DSG.TO) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. DSG.TO values in CAD, COST values in USD

DSG.TO vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Descartes Systems Group Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
66.7%
-25.1%
Portfolio components
DSG.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Descartes Systems Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 130.68M and revenue of 195.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.7%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.

DSG.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Descartes Systems Group Inc. reported an operating income of 66.08M and revenue of 195.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.7%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

DSG.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Descartes Systems Group Inc. reported a net income of 46.33M and revenue of 195.83M, resulting in a net margin of 23.7%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DSG.TO and COST have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSG.TO and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer