DSEP vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DSEP (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DSEP is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect September Series Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DSEP returned 14.32% vs 4.57% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. DSEP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

DSEP vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September (DSEP) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSEP achieves a 5.26% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.70% return.

DSEP

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.98%
• YTD: 5.26%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 14.32%
• 3Y*: 12.47%
• 5Y*: 8.02%
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 4.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSEP vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September	5.26%	9.52%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.70%	2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between DSEP and RBIL is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025	-0.21

Return for Risk

DSEP vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSEP

DSEP Risk / Return Rank: 77
DSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
DSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 83
DSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
DSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 80

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 98
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSEP vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September (DSEP) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DSEP	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	5.01	-2.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	7.92	-4.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	2.39	-0.89
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	17.00	-13.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.66	70.66	-55.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DSEP vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSEP Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSEP and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DSEP	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45	5.01	-2.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.14	4.28	-3.13

Drawdowns

DSEP vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSEP drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSEP and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DSEP	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.78%	-0.50%	-11.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.54%	-0.27%	-4.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	0.00%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-0.06%	-1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	0.07%	+0.85%

Volatility

DSEP vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September (DSEP) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that DSEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DSEP	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.93%	0.30%	+0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.55%	0.79%	+3.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.88%	0.92%	+4.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.74%	1.05%	+6.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.47%	1.05%	+6.42%

DSEP vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

DSEP vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

DSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%.

Position	TTM	2025
DSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September	0.00%	0.00%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.60%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DSEP and RBIL in my portfolio?

DSEP and RBIL have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DSEP or RBIL?

DSEP has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSEP dropped -11.78% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

Which ETF is better, DSEP or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, DSEP leads with 14.32% vs 4.57% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DSEP or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, DSEP has performed better with a 14.32% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DSEP or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DSEP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DSEP or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.00% for DSEP.

What is the main difference between DSEP and RBIL?

DSEP is categorized as Options Trading, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. DSEP tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect September Series Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DSEP and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.