DSCVX vs. DTGRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DSCVX (BNY Mellon Opportunistic Small Cap Fund) and DTGRX (BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - DSCVX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by BNY Mellon, while DTGRX is a Technology Equities fund managed by BNY Mellon. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DSCVX charges 1.11%/yr vs 1.16%/yr for DTGRX.

Performance

DSCVX vs. DTGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Opportunistic Small Cap Fund (DSCVX) and BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DSCVX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DTGRX

• 1D: 2.55%
• 1M: 20.06%
• YTD: 33.37%
• 6M: 33.66%
• 1Y: 64.06%
• 3Y*: 38.30%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: 23.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSCVX vs. DTGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DSCVX BNY Mellon Opportunistic Small Cap Fund	10.17%	10.21%	3.68%	9.01%	-17.55%	15.93%	18.98%	21.12%	-19.99%	24.42%
DTGRX BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund	33.37%	27.20%	30.78%	59.98%	-46.44%	12.62%	69.80%	52.82%	-1.47%	42.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DSCVX and DTGRX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 1997	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between DSCVX and DTGRX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

DSCVX vs. DTGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTGRX

DTGRX Risk / Return Rank: 79
DTGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
DTGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DTGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
DTGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
DTGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSCVX vs. DTGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Opportunistic Small Cap Fund (DSCVX) and BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DSCVX	DTGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.45	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DSCVX	DTGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-83.23%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.27%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-52.92%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-38.75%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.76%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DSCVX	DTGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	21.82%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	28.64%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	27.99%	—

DSCVX vs. DTGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSCVX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than DTGRX's 1.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

DSCVX vs. DTGRX - Dividend Comparison

DSCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than DTGRX's 9.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DSCVX BNY Mellon Opportunistic Small Cap Fund	4.19%	1.48%	0.50%	1.36%	4.05%	9.75%	0.20%	0.16%	29.45%	12.41%	0.41%	4.10%
DTGRX BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund	9.03%	12.04%	8.98%	0.00%	0.00%	21.32%	5.76%	34.25%	30.17%	9.91%	10.19%	6.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DSCVX and DTGRX in my portfolio?

DSCVX and DTGRX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.