PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSCIX vs. RYWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSCIX vs. RYWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX) and Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSCIX achieves a 24.24% return, which is significantly lower than RYWCX's 25.73% return. Over the past 10 years, DSCIX has outperformed RYWCX with an annualized return of 9.77%, while RYWCX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.33% annualized return.


DSCIX

1D
0.71%
1M
-2.55%
6M
18.24%
YTD
24.24%
1Y
41.14%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
9.77%
ALL TIME*
9.65%

RYWCX

1D
2.25%
1M
-3.49%
6M
19.44%
YTD
25.73%
1Y
34.86%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
7.33%
ALL TIME*
6.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DSCIX vs. RYWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSCIX
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund
24.24%13.18%5.10%20.00%-21.46%30.92%13.33%21.51%-16.96%11.59%
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
25.73%7.76%7.20%17.03%-30.33%16.37%15.23%11.58%-9.55%15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DSCIX and RYWCX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.94

The correlation between DSCIX and RYWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSCIX vs. RYWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DSCIX
DSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

RYWCX
RYWCX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RYWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
RYWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DSCIX vs. RYWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX) and Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DSCIXRYWCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.29

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.44

3.77

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.73

11.60

+7.13

DSCIX vs. RYWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the RYWCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSCIX and RYWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DSCIX vs. RYWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSCIX drawdown since its inception was -47.60%, smaller than the maximum RYWCX drawdown of -60.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSCIX and RYWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSCIXRYWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.60%

-60.64%

+13.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-8.49%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.94%

-26.39%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.94%

-40.28%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.60%

-54.65%

+7.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.18%

-5.02%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-13.37%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

2.76%

-0.71%

Volatility

DSCIX vs. RYWCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX) is 3.80%, while Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that DSCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSCIXRYWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

5.65%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.39%

14.48%

-2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.23%

18.97%

-1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.12%

22.92%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.20%

24.72%

-1.52%

DSCIX vs. RYWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSCIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than RYWCX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

DSCIX vs. RYWCX - Dividend Comparison

DSCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, while RYWCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DSCIX
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund
4.79%6.01%0.16%0.30%4.99%8.71%0.05%0.00%9.11%0.03%0.18%
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.52%0.00%0.00%59.93%0.00%0.00%9.26%3.92%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DSCIX and RYWCX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYWCX has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to DSCIX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSCIX dropped -47.60% vs RYWCX's -60.64%.

DSCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSCIX and RYWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer