DSCIX vs. EMCAX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DSCIX (Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund) and EMCAX (Empiric 2500 Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DSCIX returned 9.67%/yr vs 10.68%/yr for EMCAX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DSCIX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.96%/yr for EMCAX.

Performance

DSCIX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSCIX achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly higher than EMCAX's 10.47% return. Over the past 10 years, DSCIX has underperformed EMCAX with an annualized return of 9.67%, while EMCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.68% annualized return.

DSCIX

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 3.54%
• YTD: 20.85%
• 6M: 21.28%
• 1Y: 46.53%
• 3Y*: 17.01%
• 5Y*: 8.05%
• 10Y*: 9.67%

EMCAX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: 16.39%
• 3Y*: 12.38%
• 5Y*: 3.99%
• 10Y*: 10.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSCIX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DSCIX Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund	20.85%	13.18%	5.10%	20.00%	-21.46%	30.92%	13.33%	21.51%	-16.96%	11.59%
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund	10.47%	2.37%	13.89%	12.43%	-16.06%	16.07%	27.81%	19.10%	-4.64%	21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between DSCIX and EMCAX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.90

The correlation between DSCIX and EMCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DSCIX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSCIX

DSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 85
DSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
DSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
DSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
DSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

EMCAX

EMCAX Risk / Return Rank: 21
EMCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
EMCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
EMCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
EMCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
EMCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSCIX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DSCIX	EMCAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.75	1.15	+1.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.82	1.77	+2.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.20	+0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.54	1.91	+4.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	23.55	7.24	+16.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DSCIX vs. EMCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the EMCAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSCIX and EMCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DSCIX	EMCAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.75	1.15	+1.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.22	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.53	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.46	-0.05

Drawdowns

DSCIX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSCIX drawdown since its inception was -47.60%, smaller than the maximum EMCAX drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSCIX and EMCAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DSCIX	EMCAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.60%	-51.81%	+4.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.08%	-8.60%	+1.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.94%	-19.19%	-13.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.94%	-30.60%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.60%	-42.79%	-4.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.06%	+3.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.87%	-13.27%	+3.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	2.27%	-0.30%

Volatility

DSCIX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison

Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) have volatilities of 4.53% and 4.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DSCIX	EMCAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.53%	4.62%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.06%	11.26%	+0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.22%	14.17%	+3.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.19%	18.17%	+4.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.25%	20.24%	+3.01%

DSCIX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSCIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

DSCIX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison

DSCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than EMCAX's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DSCIX Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund	4.97%	6.01%	0.16%	0.30%	4.99%	8.71%	0.05%	0.00%	9.11%	0.03%	0.18%
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund	0.12%	0.13%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.51%	7.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DSCIX and EMCAX in my portfolio?

DSCIX and EMCAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DSCIX or EMCAX?

EMCAX has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to DSCIX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSCIX dropped -47.60% vs EMCAX's -51.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DSCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.