PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSBFX vs. TIBDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSBFX vs. TIBDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Domini Impact Bond Fund (DSBFX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSBFX achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than TIBDX's 0.67% return. Over the past 10 years, DSBFX has underperformed TIBDX with an annualized return of 1.53%, while TIBDX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.99% annualized return.


DSBFX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.40%
1Y
5.03%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
-0.30%
10Y*
1.53%

TIBDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.67%
6M
0.72%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
4.33%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*
1.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSBFX vs. TIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSBFX
Domini Impact Bond Fund
0.63%6.07%1.73%5.73%-15.11%-0.80%10.10%9.15%-0.77%3.28%
TIBDX
TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund
0.67%7.38%1.95%5.63%-13.68%-0.95%8.10%9.57%-0.64%4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between DSBFX and TIBDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2000

0.91

The correlation between DSBFX and TIBDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSBFX vs. TIBDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSBFX
DSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

TIBDX
TIBDX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TIBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSBFX vs. TIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Domini Impact Bond Fund (DSBFX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DSBFXTIBDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

1.56

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

2.34

-0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

2.04

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.12

6.36

-1.24

DSBFX vs. TIBDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the TIBDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSBFX and TIBDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DSBFXTIBDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.56

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.05

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.42

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.95

-0.61

Drawdowns

DSBFX vs. TIBDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSBFX drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, which is greater than TIBDX's maximum drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSBFX and TIBDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSBFXTIBDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.10%

-18.82%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.95%

-2.98%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.59%

-6.29%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.10%

-18.82%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.10%

-18.82%

-1.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-1.22%

-2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-2.30%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.95%

+0.01%

Volatility

DSBFX vs. TIBDX - Volatility Comparison

Domini Impact Bond Fund (DSBFX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) have volatilities of 1.38% and 1.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSBFXTIBDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

1.39%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

2.88%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72%

3.90%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.00%

5.63%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.01%

4.73%

+0.28%

DSBFX vs. TIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSBFX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBDX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DSBFX vs. TIBDX - Dividend Comparison

DSBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than TIBDX's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSBFX
Domini Impact Bond Fund
3.13%3.09%3.13%2.59%1.81%2.31%5.03%2.38%2.67%1.70%0.48%0.55%
TIBDX
TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund
4.45%4.34%3.60%3.22%2.44%2.39%4.45%3.09%2.88%2.93%3.80%4.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DSBFX and TIBDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TIBDX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to DSBFX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSBFX dropped -20.10% vs TIBDX's -18.82%.

TIBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSBFX and TIBDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer