PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSBFX vs. MWIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSBFX vs. MWIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Domini Impact Bond Fund (DSBFX) and Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSBFX achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly higher than MWIGX's -0.05% return.


DSBFX

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.34%
6M
0.60%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
-0.51%
10Y*
1.47%

MWIGX

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.35%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.32%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSBFX vs. MWIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DSBFX
Domini Impact Bond Fund
0.34%6.07%1.73%5.73%-15.11%-0.80%10.10%9.15%0.79%
MWIGX
Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund
-0.05%7.99%3.82%6.55%-13.01%-1.13%8.41%11.21%4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between DSBFX and MWIGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018

0.85

The correlation between DSBFX and MWIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSBFX vs. MWIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSBFX
DSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
DSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
DSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

MWIGX
MWIGX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MWIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MWIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSBFX vs. MWIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Domini Impact Bond Fund (DSBFX) and Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DSBFXMWIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.26

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

1.93

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.99

6.03

-2.03

DSBFX vs. MWIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the MWIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSBFX and MWIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DSBFX vs. MWIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSBFX drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, which is greater than MWIGX's maximum drawdown of -18.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSBFX and MWIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSBFXMWIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.10%

-18.32%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.95%

-2.35%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.59%

-3.88%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.10%

-18.32%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.93%

-1.31%

-2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-4.45%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

0.75%

+0.28%

Volatility

DSBFX vs. MWIGX - Volatility Comparison

Domini Impact Bond Fund (DSBFX) and Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX) have volatilities of 1.14% and 1.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSBFXMWIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

1.15%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

2.48%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

3.25%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

4.95%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.02%

4.76%

+0.26%

DSBFX vs. MWIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSBFX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than MWIGX's 1.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

DSBFX vs. MWIGX - Dividend Comparison

DSBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than MWIGX's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSBFX
Domini Impact Bond Fund
3.14%3.09%3.13%2.59%1.81%2.31%5.03%2.38%2.67%1.70%0.48%0.55%
MWIGX
Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund
4.07%3.70%4.52%4.97%6.33%4.25%9.21%12.03%3.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, DSBFX and MWIGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MWIGX has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to DSBFX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSBFX dropped -20.10% vs MWIGX's -18.32%.

MWIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSBFX and MWIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer