PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSBFX vs. GUGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSBFX vs. GUGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Domini Impact Bond Fund (DSBFX) and GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSBFX achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than GUGAX's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, DSBFX has underperformed GUGAX with an annualized return of 1.27%, while GUGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.36% annualized return.


DSBFX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.18%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
-0.39%
1Y
1.61%
3Y*
3.68%
5Y*
-0.87%
10Y*
1.27%
ALL TIME*
1.34%

GUGAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.38%
YTD
0.96%
1Y
3.41%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
-0.70%
10Y*
1.36%
ALL TIME*
0.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DSBFX vs. GUGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSBFX
Domini Impact Bond Fund
-0.39%6.07%1.73%5.73%-15.11%-0.80%10.10%9.15%-0.77%3.28%
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
0.96%7.29%0.96%6.02%-14.52%-3.17%4.91%9.66%2.13%4.44%

Correlation

The correlation between DSBFX and GUGAX is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2000

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between DSBFX and GUGAX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSBFX vs. GUGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DSBFX
DSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
DSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
DSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GUGAX
GUGAX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GUGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GUGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DSBFX vs. GUGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Domini Impact Bond Fund (DSBFX) and GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DSBFXGUGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.48

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

4.81

-3.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.33

13.57

-11.24

DSBFX vs. GUGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSBFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the GUGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSBFX and GUGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DSBFX vs. GUGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSBFX drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, smaller than the maximum GUGAX drawdown of -38.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSBFX and GUGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSBFXGUGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.10%

-38.57%

+18.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.95%

-1.00%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.37%

-5.81%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.10%

-20.53%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.10%

-23.06%

+2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.62%

-6.72%

+2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-11.25%

+7.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

0.38%

+0.78%

Volatility

DSBFX vs. GUGAX - Volatility Comparison

Domini Impact Bond Fund (DSBFX) has a higher volatility of 0.97% compared to GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) at 0.00%. This indicates that DSBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSBFXGUGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

0.00%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.84%

1.01%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59%

2.51%

+1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

6.57%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.01%

5.42%

-0.41%

DSBFX vs. GUGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSBFX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than GUGAX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DSBFX vs. GUGAX - Dividend Comparison

DSBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than GUGAX's 3.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSBFX
Domini Impact Bond Fund
2.94%3.09%3.13%2.59%1.81%2.31%5.03%2.38%2.67%1.70%0.48%0.55%
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
3.45%3.69%4.34%0.00%1.94%2.90%7.96%5.74%5.08%2.43%3.29%1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


DSBFX and GUGAX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DSBFX has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to GUGAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSBFX dropped -20.10% vs GUGAX's -38.57%.

GUGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSBFX and GUGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer