PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRV vs. INKM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRV vs. INKM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRV achieves a -21.02% return, which is significantly lower than INKM's 5.92% return. Over the past 10 years, DRV has underperformed INKM with an annualized return of -28.87%, while INKM has yielded a comparatively higher 5.62% annualized return.


DRV

1D
-1.47%
1M
6.20%
YTD
-21.02%
6M
-18.87%
1Y
-16.17%
3Y*
-22.75%
5Y*
-15.22%
10Y*
-28.87%

INKM

1D
0.35%
1M
0.72%
YTD
5.92%
6M
6.41%
1Y
13.38%
3Y*
10.14%
5Y*
4.11%
10Y*
5.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRV vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRV
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares
-21.02%-7.27%-10.50%-33.74%68.51%-68.77%-60.48%-51.70%5.07%-17.10%
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF
5.92%11.86%5.70%10.26%-12.58%8.52%3.11%17.12%-5.32%13.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DRV and INKM is -0.70, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2012

-0.70

The correlation between DRV and INKM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.76 to -0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRV vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRV
DRV Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
DRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRV Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
DRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRV Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

INKM
INKM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRV vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRVINKMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.40

2.26

-2.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.35

3.21

-3.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.43

-0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

2.97

-3.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.19

11.74

-12.92

DRV vs. INKM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRV Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the INKM Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRV and INKM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRVINKMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

2.26

-2.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

0.50

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.46

0.58

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.68

0.58

-1.25

Drawdowns

DRV vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRV drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than INKM's maximum drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRV and INKM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRVINKMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-28.58%

-71.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.02%

-4.55%

-25.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.74%

-9.25%

-61.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.26%

-19.18%

-54.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.31%

-28.58%

-68.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-0.04%

-99.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-97.77%

-3.70%

-94.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.45%

1.15%

+12.30%

Volatility

DRV vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) has a higher volatility of 11.56% compared to SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) at 1.72%. This indicates that DRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INKM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRVINKMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.56%

1.72%

+9.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.11%

4.61%

+24.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.37%

5.94%

+34.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.91%

8.30%

+48.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.67%

9.78%

+52.89%

DRV vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRV has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than INKM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRV vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison

DRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than INKM's 4.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRV
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares
3.55%2.88%4.57%5.35%0.38%0.00%0.58%1.71%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF
4.85%5.82%4.83%4.56%5.03%3.74%3.88%4.38%4.08%3.10%3.39%3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRV and INKM have a correlation of -0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRV has higher volatility (11.56%) compared to INKM (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRV dropped -99.99% vs INKM's -28.58%.

On 10-year performance, INKM leads with 5.62% vs -28.87% for DRV. On fees, INKM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, INKM has been the lower-risk option at 1.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, INKM has performed better with a 5.62% return vs -28.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INKM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for DRV.

INKM has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 3.55% for DRV.

DRV is categorized as REIT, while INKM is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for DRV and 0.50% for INKM.

INKM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRV and INKM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer