DRV vs. IFGL
DRV (Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares) and IFGL (iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds - DRV tracks the MSCI US REIT Index (-300%) while IFGL tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DRV returned -28.87%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for IFGL. At a correlation of -0.60, they often move in opposite directions. DRV charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for IFGL.
Performance
DRV vs. IFGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRV achieves a -21.02% return, which is significantly lower than IFGL's -1.03% return. Over the past 10 years, DRV has underperformed IFGL with an annualized return of -28.87%, while IFGL has yielded a comparatively higher 1.53% annualized return.
DRV
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- -21.02%
- 6M
- -18.87%
- 1Y
- -16.17%
- 3Y*
- -22.75%
- 5Y*
- -15.22%
- 10Y*
- -28.87%
IFGL
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- -1.03%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 6.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.01%
- 5Y*
- -2.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.53%
DRV vs. IFGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRV Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares | -21.02% | -7.27% | -10.50% | -33.74% | 68.51% | -68.77% | -60.48% | -51.70% | 5.07% | -17.10% |
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | -1.03% | 24.31% | -7.25% | 5.40% | -24.21% | 8.29% | -7.62% | 20.65% | -6.39% | 20.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRV and IFGL is -0.55, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2009 | -0.60 |
The correlation between DRV and IFGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.62 to -0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRV vs. IFGL — Risk / Return Rank
DRV
IFGL
DRV vs. IFGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) and iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRV | IFGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | 0.49 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | 0.79 | -1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.10 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 0.53 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 1.65 | -2.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRV | IFGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 | 0.49 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | -0.14 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.46 | 0.09 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.68 | 0.04 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
DRV vs. IFGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRV drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than IFGL's maximum drawdown of -67.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRV and IFGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRV | IFGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -67.94% | -32.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.02% | -14.38% | -15.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.74% | -18.77% | -51.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.26% | -38.47% | -34.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.31% | -40.38% | -56.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -13.93% | -86.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.77% | -16.68% | -81.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.45% | 4.59% | +8.86% |
Volatility
DRV vs. IFGL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) has a higher volatility of 11.56% compared to iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) at 4.58%. This indicates that DRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRV | IFGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.56% | 4.58% | +6.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.11% | 11.42% | +17.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.37% | 13.66% | +26.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.91% | 16.38% | +40.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.67% | 16.59% | +46.08% |
DRV vs. IFGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRV has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than IFGL's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRV vs. IFGL - Dividend Comparison
DRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than IFGL's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRV Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares | 3.55% | 2.88% | 4.57% | 5.35% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 1.71% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | 3.85% | 3.71% | 4.83% | 1.82% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 2.17% | 7.60% | 4.10% | 4.90% | 7.68% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRV and IFGL have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRV has higher volatility (11.56%) compared to IFGL (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRV dropped -99.99% vs IFGL's -67.94%.
On 10-year performance, IFGL leads with 1.53% vs -28.87% for DRV. On fees, IFGL is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, IFGL has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IFGL has performed better with a 1.53% return vs -28.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFGL is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for DRV.
IFGL has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 3.55% for DRV.
DRV tracks MSCI US REIT Index (-300%), while IFGL tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for DRV and 0.48% for IFGL.
IFGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRV and IFGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer