PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRV vs. BLDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DRV vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DRV vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DRV
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares
-4.84%-7.27%-10.50%-33.74%68.51%-68.77%-35.93%
BLDG
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
-0.94%4.26%8.18%1.76%-14.66%22.47%15.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRV achieves a -4.84% return, which is significantly lower than BLDG's -0.94% return.


DRV

1D
-4.51%
1M
21.51%
YTD
-4.84%
6M
6.92%
1Y
-2.33%
3Y*
-16.64%
5Y*
-17.08%
10Y*
-27.91%

BLDG

1D
1.25%
1M
-8.62%
YTD
-0.94%
6M
-3.58%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
2.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DRV vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRV has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DRV vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRV
DRV Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
DRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
DRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRV Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

BLDG
BLDG Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BLDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BLDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRV vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRVBLDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.05

0.46

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.29

0.71

-0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.09

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

0.55

-0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.17

2.04

-2.21

DRV vs. BLDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRV Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the BLDG Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRV and BLDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRVBLDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

0.46

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.15

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.67

0.38

-1.05

Correlation

The correlation between DRV and BLDG is -0.82. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

DRV vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison

DRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than BLDG's 6.12% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRV
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares
2.95%2.88%4.57%5.35%0.38%0.00%0.58%1.71%0.42%
BLDG
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
6.12%7.46%7.97%4.99%3.99%10.40%0.59%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DRV vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRV drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRV and BLDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DRVBLDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-27.25%

-72.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.54%

-10.80%

-32.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.31%

-27.25%

-44.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-8.96%

-91.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-97.75%

-9.44%

-88.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.46%

2.93%

+28.53%

Volatility

DRV vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) has a higher volatility of 13.49% compared to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) at 4.20%. This indicates that DRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DRVBLDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.49%

4.20%

+9.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.29%

7.38%

+20.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.18%

13.30%

+35.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.93%

15.24%

+41.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.66%

15.61%

+47.05%