DRV vs. AFK
DRV (Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares) and AFK (VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRV is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US REIT Index (-300%), while AFK is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DRV returned -28.87%/yr vs 5.75%/yr for AFK. At a correlation of -0.38, they often move in opposite directions. DRV charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for AFK.
Performance
DRV vs. AFK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRV achieves a -21.02% return, which is significantly lower than AFK's 3.48% return. Over the past 10 years, DRV has underperformed AFK with an annualized return of -28.87%, while AFK has yielded a comparatively higher 5.75% annualized return.
DRV
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- -21.02%
- 6M
- -18.87%
- 1Y
- -16.17%
- 3Y*
- -22.75%
- 5Y*
- -15.22%
- 10Y*
- -28.87%
AFK
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 44.31%
- 3Y*
- 23.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 5.75%
DRV vs. AFK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRV Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares | -21.02% | -7.27% | -10.50% | -33.74% | 68.51% | -68.77% | -60.48% | -51.70% | 5.07% | -17.10% |
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF | 3.48% | 74.71% | 12.10% | -12.11% | -17.31% | 3.00% | 4.26% | 9.90% | -19.55% | 28.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRV and AFK is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2009 | -0.38 |
The correlation between DRV and AFK shifts across timeframes, from -0.38 (all time) to -0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRV vs. AFK — Risk / Return Rank
DRV
AFK
DRV vs. AFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) and VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRV | AFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | 1.74 | -2.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | 2.22 | -2.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.31 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 2.44 | -2.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 7.38 | -8.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRV | AFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 | 1.74 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | 0.29 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.46 | 0.26 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.68 | 0.01 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
DRV vs. AFK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRV drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than AFK's maximum drawdown of -62.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRV and AFK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRV | AFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -62.46% | -37.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.02% | -19.54% | -10.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.74% | -19.54% | -51.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.26% | -38.46% | -34.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.31% | -53.33% | -43.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -9.42% | -90.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.77% | -32.04% | -65.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.45% | 6.45% | +7.00% |
Volatility
DRV vs. AFK - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) has a higher volatility of 11.56% compared to VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) at 8.12%. This indicates that DRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRV | AFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.56% | 8.12% | +3.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.11% | 22.33% | +6.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.37% | 25.62% | +14.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.91% | 22.07% | +34.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.67% | 22.16% | +40.51% |
DRV vs. AFK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRV has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than AFK's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRV vs. AFK - Dividend Comparison
DRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than AFK's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF | 0.98% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 2.27% | 3.59% | 4.17% | 3.91% | 6.34% | 1.71% | 1.99% | 2.67% | 2.16% |
DRV Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares | 3.55% | 2.88% | 4.57% | 5.35% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 1.71% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRV and AFK have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRV has higher volatility (11.56%) compared to AFK (8.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRV dropped -99.99% vs AFK's -62.46%.
On 10-year performance, AFK leads with 5.75% vs -28.87% for DRV. On fees, AFK is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, AFK has been the lower-risk option at 8.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, AFK has performed better with a 5.75% return vs -28.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AFK is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for DRV.
DRV has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.98% for AFK.
DRV is categorized as REIT, while AFK is Foreign Large Cap Equities. DRV tracks MSCI US REIT Index (-300%), while AFK tracks Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for DRV and 0.78% for AFK.
AFK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRV and AFK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer