DRSK vs. HEQT
DRSK (Aptus Defined Risk ETF) and HEQT (Simplify Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRSK is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while HEQT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DRSK returned 9.30%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for HEQT. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRSK charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for HEQT.
Performance
DRSK vs. HEQT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRSK achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly lower than HEQT's 4.92% return.
DRSK
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 8.04%
- 3Y*
- 9.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- —
HEQT
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 4.92%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 14.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRSK vs. HEQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF | 4.10% | 7.67% | 12.50% | 2.08% | -9.57% | -0.29% |
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF | 4.92% | 10.08% | 18.30% | 16.61% | -8.25% | 2.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRSK and HEQT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021 | 0.52 |
The correlation between DRSK and HEQT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
DRSK vs. HEQT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRSK
HEQT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DRSK
HEQT
Financial Services
DRSK
HEQT
Communication Services
DRSK
HEQT
Consumer Cyclical
DRSK
HEQT
Healthcare
DRSK
HEQT
Industrials
DRSK
HEQT
Consumer Defensive
DRSK
HEQT
Energy
DRSK
HEQT
Utilities
DRSK
HEQT
Real Estate
DRSK
HEQT
Basic Materials
DRSK
HEQT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRSK vs. HEQT — Risk / Return Rank
DRSK
HEQT
DRSK vs. HEQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRSK | HEQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.49 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 2.92 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.89 | 13.35 | -10.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRSK | HEQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.33 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 1.08 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
DRSK vs. HEQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRSK drawdown since its inception was -19.87%, which is greater than HEQT's maximum drawdown of -11.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRSK and HEQT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRSK | HEQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.87% | -11.51% | -8.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.20% | -5.09% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.60% | -10.57% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -0.09% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -2.79% | -1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 1.11% | +1.68% |
Volatility
DRSK vs. HEQT - Volatility Comparison
Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) at 0.73%. This indicates that DRSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRSK | HEQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 0.73% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.19% | 5.27% | -0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.26% | 6.38% | +1.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.39% | 8.47% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.06% | 8.47% | -1.41% |
DRSK vs. HEQT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRSK has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than HEQT's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRSK vs. HEQT - Dividend Comparison
DRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than HEQT's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF | 3.61% | 3.67% | 3.31% | 3.57% | 1.93% | 2.64% | 5.69% | 3.04% | 2.62% |
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF | 1.19% | 1.19% | 1.29% | 4.10% | 3.94% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRSK and HEQT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRSK has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to HEQT (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRSK dropped -19.87% vs HEQT's -11.51%.
On 3-year performance, HEQT leads with 13.47% vs 9.30% for DRSK. On fees, HEQT is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, HEQT has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HEQT has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 9.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HEQT is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DRSK.
DRSK has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 1.19% for HEQT.
DRSK is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while HEQT is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DRSK and 0.53% for HEQT.
HEQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRSK and HEQT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer