DRRIX vs. HSAFX
DRRIX (BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I) and HSAFX (Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, DRRIX returned 4.38%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for HSAFX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRRIX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for HSAFX.
Performance
DRRIX vs. HSAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRRIX achieves a 6.21% return, which is significantly higher than HSAFX's -2.51% return.
DRRIX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 6.21%
- 6M
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 16.84%
- 3Y*
- 10.01%
- 5Y*
- 4.38%
- 10Y*
- 4.90%
HSAFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- -2.51%
- 6M
- -2.82%
- 1Y
- -1.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.19%
- 5Y*
- 1.71%
- 10Y*
- —
DRRIX vs. HSAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRRIX BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I | 6.21% | 12.60% | 6.88% | 2.59% | -8.47% | 6.98% | 9.75% | 1.20% |
HSAFX Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund | -2.51% | 7.78% | 1.74% | 0.65% | 4.42% | 7.23% | 11.20% | -0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRRIX and HSAFX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2019 | 0.17 |
The correlation between DRRIX and HSAFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRRIX vs. HSAFX — Risk / Return Rank
DRRIX
HSAFX
DRRIX vs. HSAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I (DRRIX) and Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRRIX | HSAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.97 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | -0.21 | +3.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.46 | -0.55 | +14.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRRIX vs. HSAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRRIX drawdown since its inception was -15.92%, which is greater than HSAFX's maximum drawdown of -5.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRRIX and HSAFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRRIX | HSAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.92% | -5.54% | -10.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.64% | -5.34% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.55% | -5.34% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.29% | -5.34% | -8.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -4.74% | +3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -1.58% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.29% | 2.04% | -0.75% |
Volatility
DRRIX vs. HSAFX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I (DRRIX) has a higher volatility of 2.44% compared to Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) at 1.97%. This indicates that DRRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRRIX | HSAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.44% | 1.97% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.06% | 4.04% | +2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.49% | 5.79% | +1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.93% | 4.91% | +2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.74% | 5.15% | +1.59% |
DRRIX vs. HSAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRRIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HSAFX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRRIX vs. HSAFX - Dividend Comparison
DRRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than HSAFX's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRRIX BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I | 3.69% | 3.92% | 4.35% | 0.05% | 9.59% | 1.65% | 1.39% | 2.79% | 3.62% | 0.88% | 2.98% | 4.46% |
HSAFX Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund | 1.81% | 1.90% | 2.15% | 1.60% | 19.12% | 3.37% | 5.55% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRRIX and HSAFX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRRIX has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to HSAFX (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRRIX dropped -15.92% vs HSAFX's -5.54%.
DRRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRRIX and HSAFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer