PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRRIX vs. MPBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRRIX vs. MPBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I (DRRIX) and BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRRIX achieves a 6.09% return, which is significantly higher than MPBFX's 0.30% return. Over the past 10 years, DRRIX has outperformed MPBFX with an annualized return of 4.98%, while MPBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.56% annualized return.


DRRIX

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
6.09%
6M
6.20%
1Y
17.16%
3Y*
9.54%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
4.98%

MPBFX

1D
0.27%
1M
0.77%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.48%
1Y
4.43%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
-0.24%
10Y*
1.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRRIX vs. MPBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRRIX
BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I
6.09%12.60%6.88%2.59%-8.47%6.98%9.75%12.29%1.12%4.29%
MPBFX
BNY Mellon Bond Fund
0.30%7.20%1.08%5.48%-13.55%-1.50%7.87%8.82%-0.53%3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between DRRIX and MPBFX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2010

0.13

The correlation between DRRIX and MPBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.31 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRRIX vs. MPBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRRIX
DRRIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DRRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DRRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

MPBFX
MPBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MPBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MPBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRRIX vs. MPBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I (DRRIX) and BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRRIXMPBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.21

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

1.55

+2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.26

4.43

+8.82

DRRIX vs. MPBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the MPBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRRIX and MPBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRRIX vs. MPBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRRIX drawdown since its inception was -15.92%, smaller than the maximum MPBFX drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRRIX and MPBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRRIXMPBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.92%

-18.40%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.64%

-2.87%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.55%

-6.18%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.29%

-18.40%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.92%

-18.40%

+2.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-2.45%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-2.41%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

1.00%

+0.29%

Volatility

DRRIX vs. MPBFX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I (DRRIX) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) at 1.21%. This indicates that DRRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRRIXMPBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

1.21%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.06%

2.80%

+3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.47%

3.74%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.94%

5.86%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.74%

4.85%

+1.89%

DRRIX vs. MPBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRRIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MPBFX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRRIX vs. MPBFX - Dividend Comparison

DRRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than MPBFX's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRRIX
BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I
3.69%3.92%4.35%0.05%9.59%1.65%1.39%2.79%3.62%0.88%2.98%4.46%
MPBFX
BNY Mellon Bond Fund
3.82%3.82%3.70%3.17%2.86%2.33%4.64%2.87%3.00%2.89%3.12%2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRRIX and MPBFX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRRIX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to MPBFX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRRIX dropped -15.92% vs MPBFX's -18.40%.

DRRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRRIX and MPBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer