DRNZ vs. TYLD
DRNZ (REX Drone ETF) and TYLD (Cambria Tactical Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRNZ is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the VettaFi Drone Index, while TYLD is a fund fund actively managed by Cambria. DRNZ is passively managed, while TYLD is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. DRNZ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TYLD.
Performance
DRNZ vs. TYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRNZ achieves a 24.77% return, which is significantly higher than TYLD's 1.50% return.
DRNZ
- 1D
- -6.81%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 24.77%
- 6M
- 32.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TYLD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRNZ vs. TYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 24.77% | -10.89% |
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF | 1.50% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRNZ and TYLD is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRNZ vs. TYLD — Risk / Return Rank
DRNZ
TYLD
DRNZ vs. TYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) and Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRNZ | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 2.53 | -2.14 |
Drawdowns
DRNZ vs. TYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRNZ drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, which is greater than TYLD's maximum drawdown of -1.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRNZ and TYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRNZ | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.52% | -1.06% | -23.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.44% | 0.00% | -7.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -0.11% | -11.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.03% | — |
Volatility
DRNZ vs. TYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRNZ | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.82% | 0.75% | +50.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.82% | 1.77% | +49.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.82% | 1.77% | +49.05% |
DRNZ vs. TYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRNZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRNZ vs. TYLD - Dividend Comparison
DRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF | 4.69% | 4.38% | 4.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRNZ and TYLD have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRNZ.
TYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 0.00% for DRNZ.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRNZ and 0.59% for TYLD.
Find the right allocation for DRNZ and TYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer