DRNZ vs. ARKX
DRNZ (REX Drone ETF) and ARKX (ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. DRNZ is passively managed, while ARKX is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRNZ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKX.
Performance
DRNZ vs. ARKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DRNZ having a 24.77% return and ARKX slightly lower at 23.67%.
DRNZ
- 1D
- -6.81%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 24.77%
- 6M
- 32.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKX
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- 10.24%
- YTD
- 23.67%
- 6M
- 28.83%
- 1Y
- 69.46%
- 3Y*
- 36.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- —
DRNZ vs. ARKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 24.77% | -10.89% |
ARKX ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF | 23.67% | -7.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRNZ and ARKX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRNZ vs. ARKX — Risk / Return Rank
DRNZ
ARKX
DRNZ vs. ARKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) and ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRNZ | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.43 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
DRNZ vs. ARKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRNZ drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, smaller than the maximum ARKX drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRNZ and ARKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRNZ | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.52% | -43.61% | +19.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.44% | -5.03% | -2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -19.99% | +8.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.57% | — |
Volatility
DRNZ vs. ARKX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRNZ | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.82% | 32.49% | +18.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.82% | 27.72% | +23.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.82% | 27.42% | +23.40% |
DRNZ vs. ARKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRNZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRNZ vs. ARKX - Dividend Comparison
Neither DRNZ nor ARKX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DRNZ and ARKX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRNZ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRNZ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKX.
DRNZ and ARKX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRNZ and 0.75% for ARKX.
Find the right allocation for DRNZ and ARKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer