DRNZ vs. ARKX
DRNZ (REX Drone ETF) and ARKX (ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. DRNZ is passively managed, while ARKX is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRNZ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKX.
Performance
DRNZ vs. ARKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRNZ achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly lower than ARKX's 11.04% return.
DRNZ
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- -12.50%
- YTD
- -1.62%
- 6M
- -4.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKX
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -9.15%
- YTD
- 11.04%
- 6M
- 7.12%
- 1Y
- 43.09%
- 3Y*
- 31.21%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- —
DRNZ vs. ARKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | -1.62% | -12.91% |
ARKX ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF | 11.04% | -5.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRNZ and ARKX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRNZ vs. ARKX — Risk / Return Rank
DRNZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARKX
DRNZ vs. ARKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) and ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRNZ | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRNZ vs. ARKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRNZ drawdown since its inception was -27.02%, smaller than the maximum ARKX drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRNZ and ARKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRNZ | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.02% | -43.61% | +16.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.02% | -14.73% | -12.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.14% | -19.86% | +7.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.93% | — |
Volatility
DRNZ vs. ARKX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRNZ | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.18% | 33.91% | +17.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.18% | 28.16% | +23.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.18% | 27.71% | +23.47% |
DRNZ vs. ARKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRNZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRNZ vs. ARKX - Dividend Comparison
Neither DRNZ nor ARKX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DRNZ and ARKX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRNZ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRNZ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKX.
DRNZ and ARKX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRNZ and 0.75% for ARKX.
Find the right allocation for DRNZ and ARKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer