PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRNL vs. COTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRNL vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Drone & Aerial Automation ETF (DRNL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DRNL

1D
-10.39%
1M
-43.38%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COTG

1D
-3.76%
1M
-12.76%
YTD
11.90%
6M
8.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRNL vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DRNL and COTG is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2026

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRNL vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Drone & Aerial Automation ETF (DRNL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRNL vs. COTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRNL vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRNL drawdown since its inception was -70.63%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -27.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRNL and COTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRNLCOTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.63%

-27.02%

-43.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.63%

-27.02%

-43.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.98%

-9.88%

-30.10%

Volatility

DRNL vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRNLCOTGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

141.57%

40.04%

+101.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

141.57%

40.04%

+101.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

141.57%

40.04%

+101.53%

DRNL vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRNL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRNL vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRNL nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DRNL and COTG have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for DRNL.

DRNL and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for DRNL and 0.75% for COTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRNL and COTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer