DRMY vs. AMDY

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

DRMY (XFUNDS Memory Income ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DRMY charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for AMDY.

Performance

DRMY vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in XFUNDS Memory Income ETF (DRMY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DRMY

• 1D: 10.33%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AMDY

• 1D: 6.81%
• 1M: 2.36%
• 6M: 104.07%
• YTD: 112.01%
• 1Y: 179.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 54.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DRMY XFUNDS Memory Income ETF	$498.95K	$498.95K	$498.95K

DRMY vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DRMY XFUNDS Memory Income ETF	7.25%
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between DRMY and AMDY is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2026	1.00

Return for Risk

DRMY vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRMY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDY

AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 93
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRMY vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XFUNDS Memory Income ETF (DRMY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRMY	AMDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.13	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.46	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.46	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.55	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.48	—

Drawdowns

DRMY vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRMY drawdown since its inception was -3.23%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRMY and AMDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRMY	AMDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.23%	-53.92%	+50.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-27.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.78%	+4.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.28%	-17.45%	+15.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRMY	AMDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.82%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	93.00%	57.82%	+35.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.00%	47.30%	+45.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.00%	47.30%	+45.70%

DRMY vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRMY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRMY vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

DRMY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 68.73%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	68.73%	80.68%	109.98%	6.68%
DRMY XFUNDS Memory Income ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRMY and AMDY in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, DRMY and AMDY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, DRMY or AMDY?

On fees, DRMY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRMY or AMDY?

DRMY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRMY or AMDY?

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 68.73%, compared with 0.00% for DRMY.

What is the main difference between DRMY and AMDY?

They also come from different issuers: XFUNDS and YieldMax ETFs. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for DRMY and 1.23% for AMDY.