PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DRMD.TO vs. ZLD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DRMD.TO vs. ZLD.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

DRMD.TO (Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF) and ZLD.TO (BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DRMD.TO returned 11.35%/yr vs 6.30%/yr for ZLD.TO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DRMD.TO vs. ZLD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMD.TO) and BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRMD.TO achieves a 12.40% return, which is significantly higher than ZLD.TO's 4.99% return.

DRMD.TO

1D
0.11%
1M
0.89%
6M
7.82%
YTD
12.40%
1Y
24.44%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
—

ZLD.TO

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.56%
6M
3.87%
YTD
4.99%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
10.02%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
6.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRMD.TO vs. ZLD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DRMD.TO
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		12.40%27.57%11.54%13.94%-8.20%9.85%20.29%
ZLD.TO
BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF		4.99%9.63%11.11%11.37%-6.68%12.56%8.62%

Correlation

The correlation between DRMD.TO and ZLD.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020

0.25

The correlation between DRMD.TO and ZLD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF

BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF

Often compared with ZLD.TO:
ZLD.TO vs. VIDY.TOZLD.TO vs. QDX.TOZLD.TO vs. ESGE.TOZLD.TO vs. ZMMK.TOZLD.TO vs. ZXM.TOZLD.TO vs. FLUR.NEOZLD.TO vs. FCIV.TO

Return for Risk

DRMD.TO vs. ZLD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DRMD.TO
DRMD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DRMD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
ZLD.TO
ZLD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
ZLD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRMD.TO vs. ZLD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMD.TO) and BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DRMD.TOZLD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.80
0.75

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.51
1.11

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.13

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

0.90

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.44

1.92

+6.52

DRMD.TO vs. ZLD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRMD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the ZLD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRMD.TO and ZLD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRMD.TO vs. ZLD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRMD.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.39%, smaller than the maximum ZLD.TO drawdown of -28.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRMD.TO and ZLD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DRMD.TOZLD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.39%

-28.97%

+5.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-7.09%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.40%

-7.47%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.39%

-15.02%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-28.97%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.32%

-2.49%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-3.69%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

3.31%

-0.41%

Volatility

DRMD.TO vs. ZLD.TO - Volatility Comparison

Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMD.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLD.TO) at 2.00%. This indicates that DRMD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZLD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DRMD.TOZLD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

2.00%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

6.39%

+4.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.66%

8.45%

+5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.87%

9.98%

+3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.88%

12.82%

+1.06%

Dividends

DRMD.TO vs. ZLD.TO - Dividend Comparison

DRMD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZLD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRMD.TO
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		0.00%0.00%12.27%1.86%2.45%2.04%1.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZLD.TO
BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF		2.20%2.29%2.45%2.66%2.62%2.31%2.62%2.17%2.36%2.23%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

DRMD.TO and ZLD.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Desjardins and BMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRMD.TO and ZLD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer