DRLL vs. XOP
DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) and XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - DRLL tracks the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index while XOP tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DRLL returned 14.67%/yr vs 14.10%/yr for XOP. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRLL charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XOP.
Performance
DRLL vs. XOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRLL achieves a 31.26% return, which is significantly lower than XOP's 36.08% return.
DRLL
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 31.26%
- 6M
- 27.14%
- 1Y
- 43.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOP
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- 36.08%
- 6M
- 26.81%
- 1Y
- 41.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- 3.80%
DRLL vs. XOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 31.26% | 7.74% | 0.02% | -1.84% | 16.56% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 36.08% | -2.15% | -1.00% | 3.56% | 5.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRLL and XOP is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | 0.93 |
The correlation between DRLL and XOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
DRLL vs. XOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRLL
XOP
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
DRLL
XOP
Consumer Cyclical
DRLL
XOP
-
Basic Materials
DRLL
-
XOP
Communication Services
DRLL
-
XOP
-
Consumer Defensive
DRLL
-
XOP
-
Financial Services
DRLL
-
XOP
-
Healthcare
DRLL
-
XOP
-
Industrials
DRLL
-
XOP
-
Real Estate
DRLL
-
XOP
-
Technology
DRLL
-
XOP
-
Utilities
DRLL
-
XOP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRLL vs. XOP — Risk / Return Rank
DRLL
XOP
DRLL vs. XOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRLL | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 2.77 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | 7.10 | +1.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRLL | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.51 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.06 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
DRLL vs. XOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRLL drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, smaller than the maximum XOP drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRLL and XOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRLL | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.73% | -90.27% | +66.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.93% | -15.14% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -34.98% | +11.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -82.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.10% | -36.40% | +28.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -42.59% | +34.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 5.90% | -1.00% |
Volatility
DRLL vs. XOP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) is 9.15%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a volatility of 10.03%. This indicates that DRLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRLL | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.15% | 10.03% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.04% | 21.64% | -3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.34% | 27.81% | -5.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.76% | 33.88% | -10.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.76% | 40.28% | -16.52% |
DRLL vs. XOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRLL has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than XOP's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRLL vs. XOP - Dividend Comparison
DRLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than XOP's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 2.33% | 2.99% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 1.90% | 2.62% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 1.61% | 2.34% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, DRLL and XOP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XOP has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to DRLL (9.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRLL dropped -23.73% vs XOP's -90.27%.
On 3-year performance, DRLL leads with 14.67% vs 14.10% for XOP. On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DRLL has been the lower-risk option at 9.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DRLL has performed better with a 14.67% return vs 14.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DRLL.
DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.90% for XOP.
DRLL tracks Bloomberg US Energy Select Index, while XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: Strive and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DRLL and 0.35% for XOP.
DRLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRLL and XOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer