DRLIX vs. HLRRX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX) and LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX).
DRLIX is managed by Dreyfus. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006. HLRRX is managed by REMSGroup. It was launched on Dec 16, 2002.
Performance
DRLIX vs. HLRRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DRLIX vs. HLRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRLIX BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund | 2.11% | 9.12% | 3.21% | 11.35% | -23.24% | 26.95% | -2.30% | 23.05% | -4.57% | 11.24% |
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund | 5.63% | -9.13% | 9.45% | 10.50% | -21.40% | 40.50% | -3.78% | 31.75% | -13.63% | -1.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRLIX achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly lower than HLRRX's 5.63% return. Over the past 10 years, DRLIX has outperformed HLRRX with an annualized return of 4.72%, while HLRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.18% annualized return.
DRLIX
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -7.94%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 9.65%
- 3Y*
- 8.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.72%
HLRRX
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DRLIX vs. HLRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRLIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HLRRX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DRLIX vs. HLRRX — Risk / Return Rank
DRLIX
HLRRX
DRLIX vs. HLRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX) and LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRLIX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 0.03 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.06 | 0.15 | +0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.02 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 0.08 | +0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.73 | 0.20 | +3.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRLIX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.03 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.12 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.20 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.32 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between DRLIX and HLRRX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DRLIX vs. HLRRX - Dividend Comparison
DRLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than HLRRX's 7.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRLIX BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund | 3.04% | 3.11% | 2.08% | 1.70% | 7.68% | 8.25% | 1.47% | 11.17% | 4.63% | 4.72% | 5.73% | 5.40% |
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund | 7.60% | 9.39% | 4.93% | 5.50% | 13.71% | 17.02% | 9.10% | 2.44% | 2.68% | 17.61% | 15.94% | 10.13% |
Drawdowns
DRLIX vs. HLRRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRLIX drawdown since its inception was -68.86%, which is greater than HLRRX's maximum drawdown of -62.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRLIX and HLRRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRLIX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.86% | -62.78% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.46% | -11.74% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -28.99% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.82% | -48.13% | +6.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.23% | -10.96% | +2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.46% | -8.52% | -5.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 4.34% | -1.57% |
Volatility
DRLIX vs. HLRRX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) at 4.14%. This indicates that DRLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DRLIX | HLRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 4.14% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 8.92% | -0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 15.60% | -1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 17.57% | -1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 20.81% | -3.21% |