DRKY vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DRKY (VistaShares Target 15 Druckenmiller Macro Distribution ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRKY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by VistaShares, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. DRKY charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

DRKY vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15 Druckenmiller Macro Distribution ETF (DRKY) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRKY achieves a -1.44% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.06% return.

DRKY

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: -1.87%
• YTD: -1.44%
• 6M: -1.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 2.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRKY vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DRKY VistaShares Target 15 Druckenmiller Macro Distribution ETF	-1.44%	11.61%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.06%	0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between DRKY and BAMU is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	-0.09

Return for Risk

DRKY vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRKY vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 Druckenmiller Macro Distribution ETF (DRKY) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRKY	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	4.14	-3.38

Drawdowns

DRKY vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRKY drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRKY and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRKY	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.68%	-0.36%	-15.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.92%	0.00%	-4.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.50%	-0.02%	-4.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRKY	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.93%	0.59%	+20.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.93%	0.87%	+20.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.93%	0.87%	+20.06%

DRKY vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRKY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRKY vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

DRKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.33%, more than BAMU's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
DRKY VistaShares Target 15 Druckenmiller Macro Distribution ETF	10.33%	3.66%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRKY and BAMU in my portfolio?

DRKY and BAMU have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DRKY or BAMU?

On fees, DRKY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRKY or BAMU?

DRKY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRKY or BAMU?

DRKY has the higher dividend yield at 10.33%, compared with 3.06% for BAMU.

What is the main difference between DRKY and BAMU?

DRKY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DRKY and 1.09% for BAMU.