DRKY vs. OMAH
DRKY (VistaShares Target 15 Druckenmiller Macro Distribution ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from VistaShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
DRKY vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRKY achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 9.54% return.
DRKY
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- 6M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 15.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $153.43K | $161.45K | $207.00K | |
| $19.26M | $17.24M | $16.29M |
DRKY vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRKY VistaShares Target 15 Druckenmiller Macro Distribution ETF | -0.50% | 11.81% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 9.54% | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRKY and OMAH is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRKY vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
DRKY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OMAH
DRKY vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 Druckenmiller Macro Distribution ETF (DRKY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRKY | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.03 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.06 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRKY vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRKY drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRKY and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRKY | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -11.83% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.62% | -1.05% | -4.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.38% | -1.23% | -3.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.23% | — |
Volatility
DRKY vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRKY | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.93% | 8.40% | +12.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.93% | 12.84% | +8.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.93% | 12.84% | +8.09% |
DRKY vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DRKY and OMAH have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
DRKY vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
DRKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.06%, less than OMAH's 15.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DRKY VistaShares Target 15 Druckenmiller Macro Distribution ETF | 13.06% | 3.66% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.01% | 12.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRKY and OMAH have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRKY and OMAH have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.01%, compared with 13.06% for DRKY.
Find the right allocation for DRKY and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer