DRIV vs. SMOG
DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) and SMOG (VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index, while SMOG is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRIV returned 9.49%/yr vs 1.76%/yr for SMOG. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRIV charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for SMOG.
Performance
DRIV vs. SMOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRIV achieves a 42.27% return, which is significantly higher than SMOG's 18.16% return.
DRIV
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- 42.27%
- 6M
- 41.87%
- 1Y
- 92.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- —
SMOG
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 18.16%
- 6M
- 17.43%
- 1Y
- 42.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.86%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
DRIV vs. SMOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 42.27% | 30.42% | -5.04% | 26.14% | -34.13% | 27.80% | 62.76% | 28.54% | -21.49% |
SMOG VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | 18.16% | 33.36% | -9.33% | 1.42% | -29.92% | -2.75% | 118.38% | 38.86% | -11.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRIV and SMOG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between DRIV and SMOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
DRIV vs. SMOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRIV
SMOG
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
DRIV
SMOG
Consumer Cyclical
DRIV
SMOG
Industrials
DRIV
SMOG
Basic Materials
DRIV
SMOG
Communication Services
DRIV
SMOG
-
Consumer Defensive
DRIV
-
SMOG
-
Energy
DRIV
-
SMOG
Financial Services
DRIV
-
SMOG
Healthcare
DRIV
-
SMOG
-
Real Estate
DRIV
-
SMOG
-
Utilities
DRIV
-
SMOG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRIV vs. SMOG — Risk / Return Rank
DRIV
SMOG
DRIV vs. SMOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRIV | SMOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.35 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.92 | 4.80 | +2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.10 | 13.62 | +10.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRIV | SMOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70 | 2.07 | +1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.07 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.07 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
DRIV vs. SMOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRIV drawdown since its inception was -41.93%, smaller than the maximum SMOG drawdown of -84.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIV and SMOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRIV | SMOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.93% | -84.39% | +42.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.43% | -8.82% | -4.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.18% | -28.72% | -5.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.93% | -47.86% | +5.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -14.61% | +13.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.13% | -52.47% | +37.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 3.10% | +0.75% |
Volatility
DRIV vs. SMOG - Volatility Comparison
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) at 7.43%. This indicates that DRIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRIV | SMOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | 7.43% | +1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.29% | 15.46% | +3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.14% | 20.49% | +4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 25.12% | +1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 25.73% | +1.67% |
DRIV vs. SMOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRIV has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SMOG's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRIV vs. SMOG - Dividend Comparison
DRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than SMOG's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.75% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMOG VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | 1.33% | 1.57% | 1.64% | 1.58% | 1.32% | 0.44% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRIV and SMOG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRIV has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to SMOG (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIV dropped -41.93% vs SMOG's -84.39%.
On 5-year performance, DRIV leads with 9.49% vs 1.76% for SMOG. On fees, SMOG is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, SMOG has been the lower-risk option at 7.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DRIV has performed better with a 9.49% return vs 1.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMOG is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DRIV.
SMOG has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.75% for DRIV.
DRIV is categorized as Global Equities, while SMOG is Alternative Energy Equities. DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index, while SMOG tracks MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DRIV and 0.61% for SMOG.
DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRIV and SMOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer