DRIV vs. COPX
DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRIV returned 9.49%/yr vs 19.87%/yr for COPX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRIV charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
DRIV vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRIV achieves a 42.27% return, which is significantly higher than COPX's 25.71% return.
DRIV
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- 42.27%
- 6M
- 41.87%
- 1Y
- 92.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- —
COPX
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- 17.74%
- YTD
- 25.71%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- 1Y
- 120.82%
- 3Y*
- 37.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 21.95%
DRIV vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 42.27% | 30.42% | -5.04% | 26.14% | -34.13% | 27.80% | 62.76% | 28.54% | -21.49% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 25.71% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -29.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRIV and COPX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018 | 0.67 |
The correlation between DRIV and COPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
DRIV vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRIV
COPX
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
DRIV
COPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
DRIV
COPX
-
Industrials
DRIV
COPX
Basic Materials
DRIV
COPX
Communication Services
DRIV
COPX
-
Consumer Defensive
DRIV
-
COPX
-
Energy
DRIV
-
COPX
-
Financial Services
DRIV
-
COPX
-
Healthcare
DRIV
-
COPX
-
Real Estate
DRIV
-
COPX
-
Utilities
DRIV
-
COPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRIV vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
DRIV
COPX
DRIV vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRIV | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.42 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.92 | 4.37 | +2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.10 | 14.00 | +10.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRIV | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70 | 2.93 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.55 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.19 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
DRIV vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRIV drawdown since its inception was -41.93%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIV and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRIV | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.93% | -83.16% | +41.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.43% | -27.82% | +14.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.18% | -39.72% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.93% | -42.12% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -5.69% | +4.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.13% | -39.30% | +24.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 8.66% | -4.81% |
Volatility
DRIV vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) is 9.36%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that DRIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRIV | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | 15.38% | -6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.29% | 35.68% | -16.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.14% | 41.41% | -16.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 36.51% | -9.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 35.55% | -8.15% |
DRIV vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRIV has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRIV vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
DRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than COPX's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.13% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.75% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRIV and COPX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (15.38%) compared to DRIV (9.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIV dropped -41.93% vs COPX's -83.16%.
On 5-year performance, COPX leads with 19.87% vs 9.49% for DRIV. On fees, COPX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, DRIV has been the lower-risk option at 9.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COPX has performed better with a 19.87% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COPX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DRIV.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.75% for DRIV.
DRIV is categorized as Global Equities, while COPX is Materials. DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DRIV and 0.65% for COPX.
DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRIV and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer