DRIP vs. ABNG
DRIP (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares) and ABNG (Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DRIP is passively managed, while ABNG is actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRIP charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ABNG.
Performance
DRIP vs. ABNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRIP achieves a -41.20% return, which is significantly lower than ABNG's -6.15% return.
DRIP
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 18.92%
- YTD
- -41.20%
- 6M
- -40.68%
- 1Y
- -42.23%
- 3Y*
- -27.26%
- 5Y*
- -38.71%
- 10Y*
- -42.06%
ABNG
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- -6.15%
- 6M
- -7.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRIP vs. ABNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRIP Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares | -41.20% | 10.62% |
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF | -6.15% | 23.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRIP and ABNG is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRIP vs. ABNG — Risk / Return Rank
DRIP
ABNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DRIP vs. ABNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) and Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRIP | ABNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRIP vs. ABNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRIP drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than ABNG's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIP and ABNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRIP | ABNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.95% | -33.03% | -66.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.93% | -11.54% | -88.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.46% | -12.31% | -78.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.75% | — | — |
Volatility
DRIP vs. ABNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRIP | ABNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.75% | 62.99% | -6.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.37% | 62.99% | +5.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.33% | 62.99% | +33.34% |
DRIP vs. ABNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRIP has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ABNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRIP vs. ABNG - Dividend Comparison
DRIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, while ABNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DRIP Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares | 3.36% | 2.86% | 4.38% | 5.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.96% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRIP and ABNG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ABNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ABNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DRIP.
DRIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 0.00% for ABNG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DRIP and 0.75% for ABNG.
Find the right allocation for DRIP and ABNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer