PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRIJX vs. DFUSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRIJX vs. DFUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX) and DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DRIJX having a 10.97% return and DFUSX slightly lower at 10.89%. Over the past 10 years, DRIJX has underperformed DFUSX with an annualized return of 12.53%, while DFUSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.43% annualized return.


DRIJX

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.15%
YTD
10.97%
6M
11.55%
1Y
26.45%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*
12.53%

DFUSX

1D
-0.73%
1M
4.17%
YTD
10.89%
6M
10.78%
1Y
27.96%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
15.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIJX vs. DFUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRIJX
Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
10.97%19.64%17.05%21.37%-15.25%21.63%14.09%25.59%-9.14%21.76%
DFUSX
DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio
10.89%17.76%24.91%26.28%-18.14%28.53%18.41%32.08%-4.45%21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIJX and DFUSX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.96

The correlation between DRIJX and DFUSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRIJX vs. DFUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIJX
DRIJX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DRIJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIJX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIJX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DFUSX
DFUSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DFUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIJX vs. DFUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX) and DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRIJXDFUSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.44

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.19

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.00

14.94

+0.06

DRIJX vs. DFUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIJX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the DFUSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIJX and DFUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRIJXDFUSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.45

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.83

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.86

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.46

+0.35

Drawdowns

DRIJX vs. DFUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIJX drawdown since its inception was -33.55%, smaller than the maximum DFUSX drawdown of -54.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIJX and DFUSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRIJXDFUSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.55%

-54.96%

+21.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-8.88%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.25%

-18.76%

+3.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.49%

-24.58%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.55%

-33.79%

+0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.73%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-10.60%

+6.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

1.89%

-0.10%

Volatility

DRIJX vs. DFUSX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX) and DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) have volatilities of 2.99% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRIJXDFUSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

2.91%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.25%

9.00%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

11.58%

-1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

16.87%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

18.07%

-2.44%

DRIJX vs. DFUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIJX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUSX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DRIJX vs. DFUSX - Dividend Comparison

DRIJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than DFUSX's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFUSX
DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio
0.96%1.04%1.24%4.17%6.24%6.57%3.82%2.74%2.64%1.56%1.95%2.87%
DRIJX
Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
2.28%2.49%2.53%3.40%3.98%2.87%4.15%2.18%2.29%1.25%1.40%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DRIJX and DFUSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DRIJX has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to DFUSX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIJX dropped -33.55% vs DFUSX's -54.96%.

DRIJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIJX and DFUSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer