DRIGX vs. FRQHX

Last updated Jul 23, 2026

DRIGX (Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund) and FRQHX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRIGX charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FRQHX.

Performance

DRIGX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIGX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DRIGX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -1.29%
• 6M: 3.46%
• YTD: 4.64%
• 1Y: 10.40%
• 3Y*: 8.51%
• 5Y*: 3.29%
• 10Y*: 7.30%
• ALL TIME*: 7.59%

FRQHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DRIGX Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

DRIGX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DRIGX Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	4.64%	11.65%	7.31%	12.95%	-20.97%	15.21%	16.43%	6.97%
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.71%	10.01%	4.68%	8.75%	-12.22%	4.04%	9.80%	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIGX and FRQHX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019	0.89

The correlation between DRIGX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DRIGX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIGX

DRIGX Risk / Return Rank: 37
DRIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
DRIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
DRIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
DRIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
DRIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

FRQHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIGX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIGX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRIGX	FRQHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.41	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DRIGX	FRQHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.96%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRIGX	FRQHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.83%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.31%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.32%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.03%	—	—

DRIGX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIGX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DRIGX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

DRIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%, more than FRQHX's 3.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DRIGX Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	7.21%	6.76%	4.33%	3.96%	5.94%	3.45%	3.32%	2.31%	2.46%	1.23%	1.38%
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.25%	3.20%	3.20%	2.95%	5.25%	6.22%	3.70%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRIGX and FRQHX in my portfolio?

DRIGX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.