DRGVX vs. DNLDX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DRGVX (BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I) and DNLDX (BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund) are both mutual funds - DRGVX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while DNLDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by BNY Mellon. Over the past 10 years, DRGVX returned 14.27%/yr vs 10.51%/yr for DNLDX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRGVX charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for DNLDX.

Performance

DRGVX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRGVX achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly higher than DNLDX's 12.26% return. Over the past 10 years, DRGVX has outperformed DNLDX with an annualized return of 14.27%, while DNLDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.51% annualized return.

DRGVX

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 1.84%
• YTD: 14.90%
• 6M: 13.49%
• 1Y: 27.76%
• 3Y*: 19.81%
• 5Y*: 14.00%
• 10Y*: 14.27%

DNLDX

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 2.69%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 6M: 10.41%
• 1Y: 19.98%
• 3Y*: 18.90%
• 5Y*: 10.35%
• 10Y*: 10.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRGVX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I	14.90%	18.48%	14.26%	12.83%	1.51%	31.14%	3.94%	27.04%	-10.52%	15.06%
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund	12.26%	9.79%	22.27%	16.99%	-14.34%	26.49%	9.29%	16.82%	-14.46%	16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between DRGVX and DNLDX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.90

The correlation between DRGVX and DNLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DRGVX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRGVX

DRGVX Risk / Return Rank: 80
DRGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
DRGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
DRGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
DRGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DRGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

DNLDX

DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 47
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRGVX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRGVX	DNLDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	1.58	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	2.28	+0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.27	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.34	2.93	+1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.85	10.95	+4.90

DRGVX vs. DNLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRGVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the DNLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRGVX and DNLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DRGVX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRGVX drawdown since its inception was -42.60%, smaller than the maximum DNLDX drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGVX and DNLDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRGVX	DNLDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.60%	-63.69%	+21.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.65%	-7.29%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.01%	-20.42%	+3.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.01%	-23.42%	+6.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.60%	-42.23%	-0.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-1.25%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.32%	-9.62%	+5.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	1.95%	-0.13%

Volatility

DRGVX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) is 4.34%, while BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that DRGVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRGVX	DNLDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	4.67%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.61%	10.24%	-0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.35%	13.58%	-1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.61%	18.55%	-2.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.80%	19.51%	-0.71%

DRGVX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRGVX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRGVX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison

DRGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, less than DNLDX's 13.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund	13.38%	14.15%	15.24%	1.69%	8.82%	17.74%	2.77%	2.65%	11.14%	11.32%	1.00%	3.12%
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I	5.99%	6.88%	6.87%	5.31%	7.99%	21.73%	2.85%	3.52%	17.87%	10.95%	2.89%	16.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRGVX and DNLDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, DRGVX and DNLDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DRGVX or DNLDX?

DNLDX has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to DRGVX (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRGVX dropped -42.60% vs DNLDX's -63.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRGVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.