DRGVX vs. DBMYX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) and BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y (DBMYX).
DRGVX is an actively managed fund by BNY Mellon. It was launched on May 31, 2001. DBMYX is a passively managed fund by BNY Mellon that tracks the performance of the Russell 2500 Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 1, 2013.
Performance
DRGVX vs. DBMYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DRGVX vs. DBMYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I | 0.14% | 18.48% | 14.26% | 12.83% | 1.51% | 31.14% | 3.94% | 27.04% | -10.52% | 15.06% |
DBMYX BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y | -8.30% | 11.94% | 10.09% | 15.63% | -33.11% | -4.44% | 68.62% | 39.27% | -1.35% | 26.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRGVX achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than DBMYX's -8.30% return. Over the past 10 years, DRGVX has outperformed DBMYX with an annualized return of 12.72%, while DBMYX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.49% annualized return.
DRGVX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
DBMYX
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -13.87%
- YTD
- -8.30%
- 6M
- -7.43%
- 1Y
- 12.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- -2.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DRGVX vs. DBMYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRGVX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMYX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DRGVX vs. DBMYX — Risk / Return Rank
DRGVX
DBMYX
DRGVX vs. DBMYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) and BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y (DBMYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRGVX | DBMYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 0.50 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 0.89 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.11 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 0.50 | +0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.39 | 1.97 | +3.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRGVX | DBMYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 0.50 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | -0.12 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.44 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.38 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between DRGVX and DBMYX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DRGVX vs. DBMYX - Dividend Comparison
DRGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.87%, less than DBMYX's 55.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I | 6.87% | 6.88% | 6.87% | 5.31% | 7.99% | 21.73% | 2.85% | 3.52% | 17.87% | 10.95% | 2.89% | 16.07% |
DBMYX BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y | 55.82% | 51.19% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.97% | 7.86% | 0.00% | 8.66% | 9.12% | 2.20% | 6.55% |
Drawdowns
DRGVX vs. DBMYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRGVX drawdown since its inception was -42.60%, smaller than the maximum DBMYX drawdown of -48.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGVX and DBMYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRGVX | DBMYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.60% | -48.24% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.22% | -19.58% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.01% | -45.79% | +28.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.60% | -48.24% | +5.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.65% | -26.11% | +19.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -15.17% | +10.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 4.97% | -2.23% |
Volatility
DRGVX vs. DBMYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) is 4.03%, while BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y (DBMYX) has a volatility of 7.77%. This indicates that DRGVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBMYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DRGVX | DBMYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 7.77% | -3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.88% | 15.64% | -6.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 24.42% | -7.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 24.50% | -8.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.81% | 24.13% | -5.32% |